The War On Terrorism: Military Tribunals And The First Amendment
Paul Michael Haridakis
Abstract
Paul Michael Haridakis
Abstract
Shortly after the September 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, Congress passed a resolution granting the President sweeping authority to take all action necessary to fight the war on terrorism. The President then issued an order authorizing the use of military tribunals to try alleged terrorists. Some civil libertarians and scholars have expressed concerns that the use of military tribunals provided in the President's order infringes on Sixth Amendment rights to a fair trial. Far less commentary has centered on First Amendment implications of this executive branch initiative. This article considers some possible First Amendment implications of the initiative. Specifically, traditional notions of the right of the public to see and the right of the media to cover trials are placed in the context of wartime.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Shortly after the September 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, Congress passed a resolution granting the President sweeping authority to take all action necessary to fight the war on terrorism. The President then issued an order authorizing the use of military tribunals to try alleged terrorists. Some civil libertarians and scholars have expressed concerns that the use of military tribunals provided in the President's order infringes on Sixth Amendment rights to a fair trial. Far less commentary has centered on First Amendment implications of this executive branch initiative. This article considers some possible First Amendment implications of the initiative. Specifically, traditional notions of the right of the public to see and the right of the media to cover trials are placed in the context of wartime.
Key concepts: Law, Terrorism, Pentagon, Political science, Context (archaeology), Order (exchange), Sociology, History