2004•Communication Law and PolicyRequires access

The War On Terrorism: Military Tribunals And The First Amendment

Paul Michael Haridakis

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Shortly after the September 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, Congress passed a resolution granting the President sweeping authority to take all action necessary to fight the war on terrorism. The President then issued an order authorizing the use of military tribunals to try alleged terrorists. Some civil libertarians and scholars have expressed concerns that the use of military tribunals provided in the President's order infringes on Sixth Amendment rights to a fair trial. Far less commentary has centered on First Amendment implications of this executive branch initiative. This article considers some possible First Amendment implications of the initiative. Specifically, traditional notions of the right of the public to see and the right of the media to cover trials are placed in the context of wartime.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Shortly after the September 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, Congress passed a resolution granting the President sweeping authority to take all action necessary to fight the war on terrorism. The President then issued an order authorizing the use of military tribunals to try alleged terrorists. Some civil libertarians and scholars have expressed concerns that the use of military tribunals provided in the President's order infringes on Sixth Amendment rights to a fair trial. Far less commentary has centered on First Amendment implications of this executive branch initiative. This article considers some possible First Amendment implications of the initiative. Specifically, traditional notions of the right of the public to see and the right of the media to cover trials are placed in the context of wartime.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Shortly after the September 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, Congress passed a resolution granting the President sweeping authority to take all action necessary to fight the war on terrorism. The President then issued an order authorizing the use of military tribunals to try alleged terrorists. Some civil libertarians and scholars have expressed concerns that the use of military tribunals provided in the President's order infringes on Sixth Amendment rights to a fair trial. Far less commentary has centered on First Amendment implications of this executive branch initiative. This article considers some possible First Amendment implications of the initiative. Specifically, traditional notions of the right of the public to see and the right of the media to cover trials are placed in the context of wartime.

Key concepts: Law, Terrorism, Pentagon, Political science, Context (archaeology), Order (exchange), Sociology, History

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The War On Terrorism: Military Tribunals And The First Amendment — Research Paper | ScholarLens