1977•The Japanese Journal of PharmacologyOpen access

DUALIST OR PSEUDO-DUALIST INTERACTIONS OF MEPYRAMINE, DIPHENHYDRAMINE AND EPROZINOL WITH HISTAMINE AT H1-RECEPTORS

Claude Labrid, Georges Dureng, Pierre Duchene-Marullaz, Jacques Moleyre

Open full text 12 citations

Abstract

The types of interaction of mepyramine (M), diphenhydramin: (D) and eprozinol (E), with histamine H1-receptors of guinea pig ileal and tracheal smooth muscle, were comparatively studied in vitro. According to the concentrations used, all three substances showed an apparent dualist mechanism of action on both preparations when histamine (dihydrochloride) was used as the agonist. The competitive component of this mechanism (at low concentrations) was characterized by the following pA2 values: 9.01 (M), 7.80 (D) and 5.64 (E) with the ileum; 8.06 (M), 7.00 (D) and 6.02 (E) with the trachea. The so called non specific component (at high concentrations) was of comparable intensity in the two organs. The pD'2 values were 5.54-5.66 (M), 4.65-4.38 (D) and 3.82-3.55 (E) with ileal and tracheal muscle, respectively. At low concentrations the equi-active dose-ratio for N/D/E (1/16/2300 on the ileum) became 1/12/110 when the trachea was used as the effector. This is surprising since histaminergic receptors of the two preparations are of the same H1-type. It is suggested that only diphenhydramine and eprozinol are really dualistic, and that the non-specific mechanism of activity differs for each drug with that of eprozinol being effective on tracheal muscle.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The types of interaction of mepyramine (M), diphenhydramin: (D) and eprozinol (E), with histamine H1-receptors of guinea pig ileal and tracheal smooth muscle, were comparatively studied in vitro. According to the concentrations used, all three substances showed an apparent dualist mechanism of action on both preparations when histamine (dihydrochloride) was used as the agonist. The competitive component of this mechanism (at low concentrations) was characterized by the following pA2 values: 9.01 (M), 7.80 (D) and 5.64 (E) with the ileum; 8.06 (M), 7.00 (D) and 6.02 (E) with the trachea. The so called non specific component (at high concentrations) was of comparable intensity in the two organs. The pD'2 values were 5.54-5.66 (M), 4.65-4.38 (D) and 3.82-3.55 (E) with ileal and tracheal muscle, respectively. At low concentrations the equi-active dose-ratio for N/D/E (1/16/2300 on the ileum) became 1/12/110 when the trachea was used as the effector. This is surprising since histaminergic receptors of the two preparations are of the same H1-type. It is suggested that only diphenhydramine and eprozinol are really dualistic, and that the non-specific mechanism of activity differs for each drug with that of eprozinol being effective on tracheal muscle.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The types of interaction of mepyramine (M), diphenhydramin: (D) and eprozinol (E), with histamine H1-receptors of guinea pig ileal and tracheal smooth muscle, were comparatively studied in vitro. According to the concentrations used, all three substances showed an apparent dualist mechanism of action on both preparations when histamine (dihydrochloride) was used as the agonist. The competitive component of this mechanism (at low concentrations) was characterized by the following pA2 values: 9.01 (M), 7.80 (D) and 5.64 (E) with the ileum; 8.06 (M), 7.00 (D) and 6.02 (E) with the trachea. The so called non specific component (at high concentrations) was of comparable intensity in the two organs. The pD'2 values were 5.54-5.66 (M), 4.65-4.38 (D) and 3.82-3.55 (E) with ileal and tracheal muscle, respectively. At low concentrations the equi-active dose-ratio for N/D/E (1/16/2300 on the ileum) became 1/12/110 when the trachea was used as the effector. This is surprising since histaminergic receptors of the two preparations are of the same H1-type. It is suggested that only diphenhydramine and eprozinol are really dualistic, and that the non-specific mechanism of activity differs for each drug with that of eprozinol being effective on tracheal muscle.

Key concepts: Mepyramine, Histaminergic, Diphenhydramine, Histamine, Ileum, Chemistry, Agonist, Mechanism of action

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
DUALIST OR PSEUDO-DUALIST INTERACTIONS OF MEPYRAMINE, DIPHENHYDRAMINE AND EPROZINOL WITH HISTAMINE AT H1-RECEPTORS — Research Paper | ScholarLens