Comparison of plain and checkerboard stimuli for brain computer interfaces based on steady state visual evoked potentials
Rosanne Zerafa, Tracey Camilleri, Owen Falzon, Kenneth P. Camilleri
Abstract
Rosanne Zerafa, Tracey Camilleri, Owen Falzon, Kenneth P. Camilleri
Abstract
A steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) is a neural response observed in the visual cortex evoked by repetitive visual stimulation. In an SSVEP-based brain-computer interface (BCI) application various visual stimuli that induce SSVEPs at different frequencies are associated with distinct commands; a user activates a particular command by focusing on the targeted stimulus. The pattern of these visual stimuli is one of the properties that affects the accuracy of SSVEP detection. This work thus compares the two most common types of stimuli, which are the plain and checkerboard stimuli, for BCI systems. Results showed a statistically significant 9.26% average increase in SSVEP classification when using a plain stimulus over a checkerboard stimulus.
OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) is a neural response observed in the visual cortex evoked by repetitive visual stimulation. In an SSVEP-based brain-computer interface (BCI) application various visual stimuli that induce SSVEPs at different frequencies are associated with distinct commands; a user activates a particular command by focusing on the targeted stimulus. The pattern of these visual stimuli is one of the properties that affects the accuracy of SSVEP detection. This work thus compares the two most common types of stimuli, which are the plain and checkerboard stimuli, for BCI systems. Results showed a statistically significant 9.26% average increase in SSVEP classification when using a plain stimulus over a checkerboard stimulus.
Key concepts: Checkerboard, Brain–computer interface, Visual evoked potentials, Stimulus (psychology), Evoked potential, Electroencephalography, Computer science, Visual cortex