2012Unpublished venueRequires access

Study on coagulation effects of PAC and PAFC on urban rainwater treatment

Hao Yang, Xianqiang Chen, Fuping Wu, Zhifang Yue, Qunshu Zhu, Xiang Yan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The coagulation tests for simulated urban rainwater were performed using PAC and PAFC respectively. The influences of coagulant type, dosage and pH of raw water on the coagulation effect were investigated. The results show that under the conditions of the fast stirring rate of 200 r/min(1 minute), the middle stirring rate of 150 r/min(5 minutes), low stirring rate of 50 r/min(15 minutes), the optimum dosage of PAC is 40ml/L, the optimum dosage of PAFC is 60ml/L. There is no significant difference in coagulation effect between PAC and PAFC. Taking cost into account, PAC was recommended. When the pH ranges from 6.5 to 7.5, the coagulation efficiency of PAC is better. When PAC dosage is 40mg/L and pH of raw water is 7.0, the removal rate of turbidity, ammonia nitrogen and CODcr was 98.14%, 18.05% and 47.46%, respectively.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The coagulation tests for simulated urban rainwater were performed using PAC and PAFC respectively. The influences of coagulant type, dosage and pH of raw water on the coagulation effect were investigated. The results show that under the conditions of the fast stirring rate of 200 r/min(1 minute), the middle stirring rate of 150 r/min(5 minutes), low stirring rate of 50 r/min(15 minutes), the optimum dosage of PAC is 40ml/L, the optimum dosage of PAFC is 60ml/L. There is no significant difference in coagulation effect between PAC and PAFC. Taking cost into account, PAC was recommended. When the pH ranges from 6.5 to 7.5, the coagulation efficiency of PAC is better. When PAC dosage is 40mg/L and pH of raw water is 7.0, the removal rate of turbidity, ammonia nitrogen and CODcr was 98.14%, 18.05% and 47.46%, respectively.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The coagulation tests for simulated urban rainwater were performed using PAC and PAFC respectively. The influences of coagulant type, dosage and pH of raw water on the coagulation effect were investigated. The results show that under the conditions of the fast stirring rate of 200 r/min(1 minute), the middle stirring rate of 150 r/min(5 minutes), low stirring rate of 50 r/min(15 minutes), the optimum dosage of PAC is 40ml/L, the optimum dosage of PAFC is 60ml/L. There is no significant difference in coagulation effect between PAC and PAFC. Taking cost into account, PAC was recommended. When the pH ranges from 6.5 to 7.5, the coagulation efficiency of PAC is better. When PAC dosage is 40mg/L and pH of raw water is 7.0, the removal rate of turbidity, ammonia nitrogen and CODcr was 98.14%, 18.05% and 47.46%, respectively.

Key concepts: Coagulation, Turbidity, Chemistry, Raw water, Rainwater harvesting, Ammonia, Significant difference, Pulp and paper industry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Study on coagulation effects of PAC and PAFC on urban rainwater treatment — Research Paper | ScholarLens