2005British Journal of MidwiferyRequires access

Reflexivity: Not just a qualitative methodological research tool

Carol Kingdon

Open publisher page 67 citations

Abstract

Reflexivity is the process associated with researchers' self-awareness – of how they impact and transform the research they undertake. It is widely accepted as a methodological consideration among researchers undertaking qualitative enquiry in midwifery. This article uses sociological literature to introduce notions of reflexivity that emphasize its importance as a theoretical concept and a methodological tool. The ‘doing’ of reflexivity is discussed using examples from published studies of maternity care. The author’s own unpublished research, investigating primigravid women's views of vaginal and caesarean birth, is also used to illustrate the relevance of reflexivity to quantitative and qualitative data collection from a social constructionist theoretical perspective. This article demonstrates that reflexive accounts of the research process should not just be confined to qualitative methodology papers, research diaries or thesis chapters, but are relevant to all research

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Reflexivity is the process associated with researchers' self-awareness – of how they impact and transform the research they undertake. It is widely accepted as a methodological consideration among researchers undertaking qualitative enquiry in midwifery. This article uses sociological literature to introduce notions of reflexivity that emphasize its importance as a theoretical concept and a methodological tool. The ‘doing’ of reflexivity is discussed using examples from published studies of maternity care. The author’s own unpublished research, investigating primigravid women's views of vaginal and caesarean birth, is also used to illustrate the relevance of reflexivity to quantitative and qualitative data collection from a social constructionist theoretical perspective. This article demonstrates that reflexive accounts of the research process should not just be confined to qualitative methodology papers, research diaries or thesis chapters, but are relevant to all research

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 67 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Reflexivity is the process associated with researchers' self-awareness – of how they impact and transform the research they undertake. It is widely accepted as a methodological consideration among researchers undertaking qualitative enquiry in midwifery. This article uses sociological literature to introduce notions of reflexivity that emphasize its importance as a theoretical concept and a methodological tool. The ‘doing’ of reflexivity is discussed using examples from published studies of maternity care. The author’s own unpublished research, investigating primigravid women's views of vaginal and caesarean birth, is also used to illustrate the relevance of reflexivity to quantitative and qualitative data collection from a social constructionist theoretical perspective. This article demonstrates that reflexive accounts of the research process should not just be confined to qualitative methodology papers, research diaries or thesis chapters, but are relevant to all research

Key concepts: Reflexivity, Qualitative research, Perspective (graphical), Relevance (law), Sociology, Epistemology, Strict constructionism, Process (computing)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reflexivity: Not just a qualitative methodological research tool — Research Paper | ScholarLens