2010Journal of HypertensionRequires access

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT VENTILATORY MODES ON HEMODYNAMIC AND CARDIAC FUNCTIONS DURING LAPAROSCOPIC OBESITY SURGERY: PP.8.313

T Soliman, A Malki

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Background: The potential clinical benefits of pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) over volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) in patients undergoing laparoscopic obesity surgery still remain debated. PCV was thought to cause many deleterious hemodynamic effects, but recent studies indicate that PCV mode of ventilation does not cause adverse effects but also there are good systolic and diastolic functions and oxygenation during this mode. Methods: We studied thirty patients of both sexes, undergoing elective laparoscopic gastric banding obesity surgery with different risk factors for CAD, aged between 31–48 years. We ventilated all patients with two different ventilatory modes, pressure controlled ventilation (PCV) and volume controlled ventilation (VCV). We applied each mode of ventilation for 30 min. At the end of which, we recorded hemodynamic parameters, systolic and diastolic functions of the heart, using Trans Esophageal Echocardiography (TEE). Results: There was a significant increase in HR (P < 0.05) during PCV mode of ventilation more than VCV. Ejection fraction (EF), Fractional shortening (FS) and stroke volume (SV) were significantly increased while LVESD and ESV were significantly decreased during PCV. These results indicate improvement of left ventricular systolic performance during PCV in comparison to VCV mode. In addition, we found a significant reduction in A-wave and an increase, in E/A ratio, with PCV. Also, isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT) was significantly increased during VCV. These results indicate impairment of left ventricular diastolic function during VCV in comparison to PCV mode. Oxygenation index was significantly increased while peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) was significantly decreased during PCV in comparison to VCV (P < 0.05). Conclusion: We concluded that there was an improvement of left ventricular systolic performance during PCV, in comparison to VCV mode. This achieves adequate tissue perfusion and oxygen delivery to meet cellular, metabolic needs which are essential goals in high risk, obese patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: The potential clinical benefits of pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) over volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) in patients undergoing laparoscopic obesity surgery still remain debated. PCV was thought to cause many deleterious hemodynamic effects, but recent studies indicate that PCV mode of ventilation does not cause adverse effects but also there are good systolic and diastolic functions and oxygenation during this mode. Methods: We studied thirty patients of both sexes, undergoing elective laparoscopic gastric banding obesity surgery with different risk factors for CAD, aged between 31–48 years. We ventilated all patients with two different ventilatory modes, pressure controlled ventilation (PCV) and volume controlled ventilation (VCV). We applied each mode of ventilation for 30 min. At the end of which, we recorded hemodynamic parameters, systolic and diastolic functions of the heart, using Trans Esophageal Echocardiography (TEE). Results: There was a significant increase in HR (P < 0.05) during PCV mode of ventilation more than VCV. Ejection fraction (EF), Fractional shortening (FS) and stroke volume (SV) were significantly increased while LVESD and ESV were significantly decreased during PCV. These results indicate improvement of left ventricular systolic performance during PCV in comparison to VCV mode. In addition, we found a significant reduction in A-wave and an increase, in E/A ratio, with PCV. Also, isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT) was significantly increased during VCV. These results indicate impairment of left ventricular diastolic function during VCV in comparison to PCV mode. Oxygenation index was significantly increased while peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) was significantly decreased during PCV in comparison to VCV (P < 0.05). Conclusion: We concluded that there was an improvement of left ventricular systolic performance during PCV, in comparison to VCV mode. This achieves adequate tissue perfusion and oxygen delivery to meet cellular, metabolic needs which are essential goals in high risk, obese patients.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: The potential clinical benefits of pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) over volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) in patients undergoing laparoscopic obesity surgery still remain debated. PCV was thought to cause many deleterious hemodynamic effects, but recent studies indicate that PCV mode of ventilation does not cause adverse effects but also there are good systolic and diastolic functions and oxygenation during this mode. Methods: We studied thirty patients of both sexes, undergoing elective laparoscopic gastric banding obesity surgery with different risk factors for CAD, aged between 31–48 years. We ventilated all patients with two different ventilatory modes, pressure controlled ventilation (PCV) and volume controlled ventilation (VCV). We applied each mode of ventilation for 30 min. At the end of which, we recorded hemodynamic parameters, systolic and diastolic functions of the heart, using Trans Esophageal Echocardiography (TEE). Results: There was a significant increase in HR (P < 0.05) during PCV mode of ventilation more than VCV. Ejection fraction (EF), Fractional shortening (FS) and stroke volume (SV) were significantly increased while LVESD and ESV were significantly decreased during PCV. These results indicate improvement of left ventricular systolic performance during PCV in comparison to VCV mode. In addition, we found a significant reduction in A-wave and an increase, in E/A ratio, with PCV. Also, isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT) was significantly increased during VCV. These results indicate impairment of left ventricular diastolic function during VCV in comparison to PCV mode. Oxygenation index was significantly increased while peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) was significantly decreased during PCV in comparison to VCV (P < 0.05). Conclusion: We concluded that there was an improvement of left ventricular systolic performance during PCV, in comparison to VCV mode. This achieves adequate tissue perfusion and oxygen delivery to meet cellular, metabolic needs which are essential goals in high risk, obese patients.

Key concepts: Medicine, Ventilation (architecture), Hemodynamics, Cardiology, Stroke volume, Ejection fraction, Diastole, Isovolumetric contraction

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EFFECT OF DIFFERENT VENTILATORY MODES ON HEMODYNAMIC AND CARDIAC FUNCTIONS DURING LAPAROSCOPIC OBESITY SURGERY: PP.8.313 — Research Paper | ScholarLens