2008Competition & ChangeRequires access

The Evolution of the Anti-Washington Consensus Debate: From ‘Post-Washington Consensus’ to ‘After the Washington Consensus’

John Marangos

Open publisher page 18 citations

Abstract

The term ‘Washington Consensus’, as Williamson the father of the term conceived it, in 1989, was a set of reforms for economic development that he judged ‘Washington’ could agree were required in Latin America. However, the Washington Consensus has been identified as a neoliberal manifesto and as a consequence an anti-Washington Consensus was initiated, as calls were made for the establishment of a different set of policies, such as the ‘Post-Washington Consensus’, ‘Washington Contentious’ and ‘After Neoliberalism’. Lately, even Williamson has come up with a new set of policies, ‘After the Washington Consensus’. The aim of this paper is to investigate the different interpretations and alternatives of this controversial set of policies, and to reveal that the evolution of the debate conceptualizes the evolution of economic thought regarding the required policies for economic development.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The term ‘Washington Consensus’, as Williamson the father of the term conceived it, in 1989, was a set of reforms for economic development that he judged ‘Washington’ could agree were required in Latin America. However, the Washington Consensus has been identified as a neoliberal manifesto and as a consequence an anti-Washington Consensus was initiated, as calls were made for the establishment of a different set of policies, such as the ‘Post-Washington Consensus’, ‘Washington Contentious’ and ‘After Neoliberalism’. Lately, even Williamson has come up with a new set of policies, ‘After the Washington Consensus’. The aim of this paper is to investigate the different interpretations and alternatives of this controversial set of policies, and to reveal that the evolution of the debate conceptualizes the evolution of economic thought regarding the required policies for economic development.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The term ‘Washington Consensus’, as Williamson the father of the term conceived it, in 1989, was a set of reforms for economic development that he judged ‘Washington’ could agree were required in Latin America. However, the Washington Consensus has been identified as a neoliberal manifesto and as a consequence an anti-Washington Consensus was initiated, as calls were made for the establishment of a different set of policies, such as the ‘Post-Washington Consensus’, ‘Washington Contentious’ and ‘After Neoliberalism’. Lately, even Williamson has come up with a new set of policies, ‘After the Washington Consensus’. The aim of this paper is to investigate the different interpretations and alternatives of this controversial set of policies, and to reveal that the evolution of the debate conceptualizes the evolution of economic thought regarding the required policies for economic development.

Key concepts: Washington Consensus, Manifesto, Political science, Consensus conference, Scientific consensus, Set (abstract data type), Neoliberalism (international relations), Political economy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Evolution of the Anti-Washington Consensus Debate: From ‘Post-Washington Consensus’ to ‘After the Washington Consensus’ — Research Paper | ScholarLens