2009Journal of Obstetrics and GynaecologyRequires access

Two cases of significant postoperative morbidity following peritoneal non-closure at caesarean section

R. Owen, D. W. POLSON

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Recently, non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section has become standard practice, mainly as a result of evidence of improved short-term postoperative outcome. Reported benefits of non-clos...

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Recently, non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section has become standard practice, mainly as a result of evidence of improved short-term postoperative outcome. Reported benefits of non-clos...

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Recently, non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section has become standard practice, mainly as a result of evidence of improved short-term postoperative outcome. Reported benefits of non-clos...

Key concepts: Medicine, Caesarean section, Closure (psychology), Peritoneum, Surgery, Pregnancy, Biology, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Two cases of significant postoperative morbidity following peritoneal non-closure at caesarean section — Research Paper | ScholarLens