1993•The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical CareRequires access

PRESSURE CONTROL VENTILATION VS CONVENTIONAL VOLUME VENTILATION IN ACUTE RESPIRATORY FAILURE

B. L. Enderson, N FLYN, R Z ABDALLA, M.E. Casey, J. Russell Langdon

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

ENDERSON, B L MD; FLYN, N MD; ABDALLA, R Z MD; CASEY, M BA; LANGDON, J R MD Author Information

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ENDERSON, B L MD; FLYN, N MD; ABDALLA, R Z MD; CASEY, M BA; LANGDON, J R MD Author Information

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ENDERSON, B L MD; FLYN, N MD; ABDALLA, R Z MD; CASEY, M BA; LANGDON, J R MD Author Information

Key concepts: Ventilation (architecture), Acute respiratory failure, Medicine, Anesthesia, Volume (thermodynamics), Respiratory failure, Positive pressure ventilation, Intensive care medicine

Back to paper search Browse research topics Original source

PRESSURE CONTROL VENTILATION VS CONVENTIONAL VOLUME VENTILATION IN ACUTE RESPIRATORY FAILURE — Research Paper | ScholarLens

PRESSURE CONTROL VENTILATION VS CONVENTIONAL VOLUME VENTILATION IN ACUTE RESPIRATORY FAILURE

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Why it matters

Key contribution

Method / approach

Main findings

Limitations

Applications

Available abstract

Related papers