1976The Quarterly Journal of EconomicsRequires access

A Remark on the Structure of Exchange in Barter and Monetary Economies

Yozo Hazome

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

In his recent paper entitled The Structure of Exchange in Barter and Monetary Economies,' R. M. Starr examined the structure of exchange in barter and monetary economies on the assumption of the classical dichotomy to demonstrate the superiority of the latter to the former in some appropriate sense. In particular, in Corollary 2 to Theorem 3 he proved that the class of all barter exchanges that are monotonically-excess-demand-diminishing, excess-demand-fulfilling, and price-consistent at prices p, is smaller, in set-theoretic sense, than the family of the real counterpart of a monetary exchange having those properties at PM. Though this is clearly the comparison of the structure of exchange at equilibrium prices, the greater flexibility of monetary trade is not confined to trade at equilibrium prices. That is, we can further prove that the class of all barter exchanges that are monotonically-excess-demand-diminishing and price-consistent at an arbitrary price system p is smaller, again in set-theoretic sense, than the family of the real counterpart of a monetary exchange having those two properties at an arbitrary pM; that is, the following:

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In his recent paper entitled The Structure of Exchange in Barter and Monetary Economies,' R. M. Starr examined the structure of exchange in barter and monetary economies on the assumption of the classical dichotomy to demonstrate the superiority of the latter to the former in some appropriate sense. In particular, in Corollary 2 to Theorem 3 he proved that the class of all barter exchanges that are monotonically-excess-demand-diminishing, excess-demand-fulfilling, and price-consistent at prices p, is smaller, in set-theoretic sense, than the family of the real counterpart of a monetary exchange having those properties at PM. Though this is clearly the comparison of the structure of exchange at equilibrium prices, the greater flexibility of monetary trade is not confined to trade at equilibrium prices. That is, we can further prove that the class of all barter exchanges that are monotonically-excess-demand-diminishing and price-consistent at an arbitrary price system p is smaller, again in set-theoretic sense, than the family of the real counterpart of a monetary exchange having those two properties at an arbitrary pM; that is, the following:

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In his recent paper entitled The Structure of Exchange in Barter and Monetary Economies,' R. M. Starr examined the structure of exchange in barter and monetary economies on the assumption of the classical dichotomy to demonstrate the superiority of the latter to the former in some appropriate sense. In particular, in Corollary 2 to Theorem 3 he proved that the class of all barter exchanges that are monotonically-excess-demand-diminishing, excess-demand-fulfilling, and price-consistent at prices p, is smaller, in set-theoretic sense, than the family of the real counterpart of a monetary exchange having those properties at PM. Though this is clearly the comparison of the structure of exchange at equilibrium prices, the greater flexibility of monetary trade is not confined to trade at equilibrium prices. That is, we can further prove that the class of all barter exchanges that are monotonically-excess-demand-diminishing and price-consistent at an arbitrary price system p is smaller, again in set-theoretic sense, than the family of the real counterpart of a monetary exchange having those two properties at an arbitrary pM; that is, the following:

Key concepts: Barter, Economics, Monetary economics, General equilibrium theory, Corollary, Mathematical economics, Keynesian economics, Microeconomics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Remark on the Structure of Exchange in Barter and Monetary Economies — Research Paper | ScholarLens