2013•Review of Public Personnel AdministrationRequires access

Federal Law Against Age and Disability Discrimination Meets the Dignity of the States

David H. Rosenbloom

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Building on Norma Riccucci’s Review of Public Personnel Administration article on “The U.S. Supreme Court’s New Federalism and Its Impact on Antidiscrimination Legislation,” the present study proceeds by (a) outlining public employees’ federal statutory rights to equal employment opportunity; (b) analyzing state sovereign immunity doctrine; (c) explaining how, when coupled with Fourteenth Amendment equal protection analysis, state sovereign immunity frustrates Congress’ effort to protect state employees from age and disability discrimination; and (d) considering whether jurisprudential concern for the role of the federal courts in the constitutional separation of powers contributes to the Supreme Court’s unwillingness to authorize state employees to litigate their federal statutorily based age and disability claims in federal and state courts. The article concludes that, when combined, the Supreme Court’s state sovereign immunity doctrine and equal protection analysis negate state employees’ federal statutory rights against age and disability discrimination as well as Congress’ Fourteenth Amendment authority to protect these public servants from such disparate treatment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Building on Norma Riccucci’s Review of Public Personnel Administration article on “The U.S. Supreme Court’s New Federalism and Its Impact on Antidiscrimination Legislation,” the present study proceeds by (a) outlining public employees’ federal statutory rights to equal employment opportunity; (b) analyzing state sovereign immunity doctrine; (c) explaining how, when coupled with Fourteenth Amendment equal protection analysis, state sovereign immunity frustrates Congress’ effort to protect state employees from age and disability discrimination; and (d) considering whether jurisprudential concern for the role of the federal courts in the constitutional separation of powers contributes to the Supreme Court’s unwillingness to authorize state employees to litigate their federal statutorily based age and disability claims in federal and state courts. The article concludes that, when combined, the Supreme Court’s state sovereign immunity doctrine and equal protection analysis negate state employees’ federal statutory rights against age and disability discrimination as well as Congress’ Fourteenth Amendment authority to protect these public servants from such disparate treatment.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Building on Norma Riccucci’s Review of Public Personnel Administration article on “The U.S. Supreme Court’s New Federalism and Its Impact on Antidiscrimination Legislation,” the present study proceeds by (a) outlining public employees’ federal statutory rights to equal employment opportunity; (b) analyzing state sovereign immunity doctrine; (c) explaining how, when coupled with Fourteenth Amendment equal protection analysis, state sovereign immunity frustrates Congress’ effort to protect state employees from age and disability discrimination; and (d) considering whether jurisprudential concern for the role of the federal courts in the constitutional separation of powers contributes to the Supreme Court’s unwillingness to authorize state employees to litigate their federal statutorily based age and disability claims in federal and state courts. The article concludes that, when combined, the Supreme Court’s state sovereign immunity doctrine and equal protection analysis negate state employees’ federal statutory rights against age and disability discrimination as well as Congress’ Fourteenth Amendment authority to protect these public servants from such disparate treatment.

Key concepts: Supreme court, Sovereign immunity, Law, Statutory law, State (computer science), Federalism, Political science, Dignity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Federal Law Against Age and Disability Discrimination Meets the Dignity of the States — Research Paper | ScholarLens