2007•Applied Measurement in EducationRequires access

Aligning a State's Alternative Standards to Regular Core Content Standards in Reading and Mathematics

Teresa J. Eckhout, Barbara Sterrett Plake, Dawn L. Smith, Ann Larsen

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 allows states to assess students with “significant cognitive disabilities” on “alternative content standards” for determining adequate yearly progress. Alternative standards that align with regular content standards can allow for a continuum of performance expectations from very basic to approaching grade level, therefore tapping into the abilities of students with significant cognitive disabilities. Performance level descriptors were developed in an effort to identify students' level of attainment for each content standard. States must demonstrate that assessments align with articulated alternative standards and that alternative standards align with the state's content standards. The purpose of this study is to examine a methodology for aligning alternative content standards to regular content standards.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 allows states to assess students with “significant cognitive disabilities” on “alternative content standards” for determining adequate yearly progress. Alternative standards that align with regular content standards can allow for a continuum of performance expectations from very basic to approaching grade level, therefore tapping into the abilities of students with significant cognitive disabilities. Performance level descriptors were developed in an effort to identify students' level of attainment for each content standard. States must demonstrate that assessments align with articulated alternative standards and that alternative standards align with the state's content standards. The purpose of this study is to examine a methodology for aligning alternative content standards to regular content standards.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 allows states to assess students with “significant cognitive disabilities” on “alternative content standards” for determining adequate yearly progress. Alternative standards that align with regular content standards can allow for a continuum of performance expectations from very basic to approaching grade level, therefore tapping into the abilities of students with significant cognitive disabilities. Performance level descriptors were developed in an effort to identify students' level of attainment for each content standard. States must demonstrate that assessments align with articulated alternative standards and that alternative standards align with the state's content standards. The purpose of this study is to examine a methodology for aligning alternative content standards to regular content standards.

Key concepts: Learning standards, Academic standards, Content (measure theory), Mathematics education, Cognition, Standards-based assessment, Reading (process), Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Aligning a State's Alternative Standards to Regular Core Content Standards in Reading and Mathematics — Research Paper | ScholarLens