1985SpineRequires access

Myelography in the Elderly and the Diagnosis of Spinal Stenosis

Alf Udén, Kjell Johnsson, Kjell Jonsson, H. Pettersson

Open publisher page 36 citations

Abstract

To evaluate the width of the spinal canal when diagnosing spinal stenosis, 91 patients older than 59 years of age when undergoing myelography were studied. Using a sagittal diameter of 11 mm as border for the diagnosis of spinal stenosis, it was found that 31 of the 66 patients with spinal claudication, suspicion of spinal claudication and sciatic pain fulfilled this criterion and that 3/25 of the control group and those with atypic symptoms had a sagittal diameter of 11 mm or less. Five patients showed a complete block on the myelogram, and all of them had a typical spinal claudication. The spinal canal will narrow with age in asymptomatic patients as well, and the myelographic stenosis in elderly patients is not always equivalent to a clinical diagnosis of spinal stenosis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To evaluate the width of the spinal canal when diagnosing spinal stenosis, 91 patients older than 59 years of age when undergoing myelography were studied. Using a sagittal diameter of 11 mm as border for the diagnosis of spinal stenosis, it was found that 31 of the 66 patients with spinal claudication, suspicion of spinal claudication and sciatic pain fulfilled this criterion and that 3/25 of the control group and those with atypic symptoms had a sagittal diameter of 11 mm or less. Five patients showed a complete block on the myelogram, and all of them had a typical spinal claudication. The spinal canal will narrow with age in asymptomatic patients as well, and the myelographic stenosis in elderly patients is not always equivalent to a clinical diagnosis of spinal stenosis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 36 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To evaluate the width of the spinal canal when diagnosing spinal stenosis, 91 patients older than 59 years of age when undergoing myelography were studied. Using a sagittal diameter of 11 mm as border for the diagnosis of spinal stenosis, it was found that 31 of the 66 patients with spinal claudication, suspicion of spinal claudication and sciatic pain fulfilled this criterion and that 3/25 of the control group and those with atypic symptoms had a sagittal diameter of 11 mm or less. Five patients showed a complete block on the myelogram, and all of them had a typical spinal claudication. The spinal canal will narrow with age in asymptomatic patients as well, and the myelographic stenosis in elderly patients is not always equivalent to a clinical diagnosis of spinal stenosis.

Key concepts: Medicine, Myelography, Spinal stenosis, Neurogenic claudication, Claudication, Stenosis, Lumbar spinal stenosis, Intermittent claudication

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Myelography in the Elderly and the Diagnosis of Spinal Stenosis — Research Paper | ScholarLens