1992The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaRequires access

Modeling air-to-water sound transmission using standard numerical codes of underwater acoustics

David M. F. Chapman, Dugald J. M. Thomson, Dale D. Ellis

Open publisher page 18 citations

Abstract

Recently, it was shown that a normal mode underwater acoustic propagation code can be modified to model air-to-water sound transmission simply by altering the mode excitation coefficients [D. M. F. Chapman and P. D. Ward, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 601–618 (1990)]. Herein, it is shown that if the height of the source above the surface is sufficiently small, then the air-to-water transmission problem can be modeled by replacing the source in air with a source in water at a depth d≪λ below the surface, where λ is the acoustic wavelength in water. For a distant receiver in water, both the true source in air and the effective source in water exhibit nearly identical dipole radiation patterns, although the source strengths are different. The correct transmission loss from the source in air can be recovered by adding the quantity 20 log10(kad), where ka is the wave number in air. Using this approach, numerical results for three standard underwater acoustic models (normal mode, multipath expansion, parabolic equation) are compared to benchmark results provided by the SAFARI model for a generic air-to-water transmission example.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Recently, it was shown that a normal mode underwater acoustic propagation code can be modified to model air-to-water sound transmission simply by altering the mode excitation coefficients [D. M. F. Chapman and P. D. Ward, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 601–618 (1990)]. Herein, it is shown that if the height of the source above the surface is sufficiently small, then the air-to-water transmission problem can be modeled by replacing the source in air with a source in water at a depth d≪λ below the surface, where λ is the acoustic wavelength in water. For a distant receiver in water, both the true source in air and the effective source in water exhibit nearly identical dipole radiation patterns, although the source strengths are different. The correct transmission loss from the source in air can be recovered by adding the quantity 20 log10(kad), where ka is the wave number in air. Using this approach, numerical results for three standard underwater acoustic models (normal mode, multipath expansion, parabolic equation) are compared to benchmark results provided by the SAFARI model for a generic air-to-water transmission example.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Recently, it was shown that a normal mode underwater acoustic propagation code can be modified to model air-to-water sound transmission simply by altering the mode excitation coefficients [D. M. F. Chapman and P. D. Ward, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 601–618 (1990)]. Herein, it is shown that if the height of the source above the surface is sufficiently small, then the air-to-water transmission problem can be modeled by replacing the source in air with a source in water at a depth d≪λ below the surface, where λ is the acoustic wavelength in water. For a distant receiver in water, both the true source in air and the effective source in water exhibit nearly identical dipole radiation patterns, although the source strengths are different. The correct transmission loss from the source in air can be recovered by adding the quantity 20 log10(kad), where ka is the wave number in air. Using this approach, numerical results for three standard underwater acoustic models (normal mode, multipath expansion, parabolic equation) are compared to benchmark results provided by the SAFARI model for a generic air-to-water transmission example.

Key concepts: Underwater, Acoustics, Transmission loss, Sound transmission class, Transmission (telecommunications), Underwater acoustics, Multipath propagation, Acoustic dispersion

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Modeling air-to-water sound transmission using standard numerical codes of underwater acoustics — Research Paper | ScholarLens