1945•Archives of Neurology And PsychiatryRequires access

SYNKINETIC PUPILLARY PHENOMENA AND THE ARGYLL ROBERTSON PUPIL

Morris B. Bender

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

From time to time the Argyll Robertson pupil has been attributed to a lesion outside the central nervous system, as in the oculomotor nerve, the ciliary ganglion or the ciliary nerves. The most recent proponents of this theory are Nathan and Turner.1On the basis of 2 cases of their own and of 8 cases collected from the literature, they concluded that the Argyll Robertson pupil may be caused by damage to the peripheral efferent pathway to the iris. They also argued that there must be two efferent routes for pupillary constriction. "Parasympathetic pupilloconstrictor fibers relay not only in the... cells of the ciliary ganglion but also in the more peripherally situated episcleral ganglia." All their evidence, however, was casuistic, and their observations were not complete. Although they constantly dealt with the problem, they neglected to mention the common diagnostic signs of the Argyll Robertson pupil, which are miosis,

About this research paper

What this paper is about

From time to time the Argyll Robertson pupil has been attributed to a lesion outside the central nervous system, as in the oculomotor nerve, the ciliary ganglion or the ciliary nerves. The most recent proponents of this theory are Nathan and Turner.1On the basis of 2 cases of their own and of 8 cases collected from the literature, they concluded that the Argyll Robertson pupil may be caused by damage to the peripheral efferent pathway to the iris. They also argued that there must be two efferent routes for pupillary constriction. "Parasympathetic pupilloconstrictor fibers relay not only in the... cells of the ciliary ganglion but also in the more peripherally situated episcleral ganglia." All their evidence, however, was casuistic, and their observations were not complete. Although they constantly dealt with the problem, they neglected to mention the common diagnostic signs of the Argyll Robertson pupil, which are miosis,

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

From time to time the Argyll Robertson pupil has been attributed to a lesion outside the central nervous system, as in the oculomotor nerve, the ciliary ganglion or the ciliary nerves. The most recent proponents of this theory are Nathan and Turner.1On the basis of 2 cases of their own and of 8 cases collected from the literature, they concluded that the Argyll Robertson pupil may be caused by damage to the peripheral efferent pathway to the iris. They also argued that there must be two efferent routes for pupillary constriction. "Parasympathetic pupilloconstrictor fibers relay not only in the... cells of the ciliary ganglion but also in the more peripherally situated episcleral ganglia." All their evidence, however, was casuistic, and their observations were not complete. Although they constantly dealt with the problem, they neglected to mention the common diagnostic signs of the Argyll Robertson pupil, which are miosis,

Key concepts: Miosis, Ciliary ganglion, Pupil, Efferent, IRIS (biosensor), Ganglion, Anatomy, Ophthalmology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
SYNKINETIC PUPILLARY PHENOMENA AND THE ARGYLL ROBERTSON PUPIL — Research Paper | ScholarLens