2013•StrabismusRequires access

Single-Vision Lenses: A Comparison of Management of High AC/A Esotropia and Refractive Esotropia

Amanda Gerling, Kyle A. Arnoldi

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Management of high AC/A includes bifocal lenses, single-vision distance lenses, and surgery. Our goal was to determine the long-term outcome of single-vision lenses (SVL) for high AC/A esotropia compared with normal AC/A ET. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with accommodative esotropia managed with SVL and a minimum 5 years of follow-up. AC/A ratio, size and control of esotropic angle, stereopsis, refractive error, and ability to control the deviation while the prescription was being weaned were measured. A study group with high AC/A esotropia was compared with a control group with refractive esotropia and a normal AC/A ratio. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients were enrolled in this study: 22 in the study group and 14 in the control group. All patients in both groups showed improvement in at least one outcome category. One patient showed deterioration in only one category. CONCLUSION: High improvement and low deterioration rates suggest that SVL are an effective treatment for high AC/A esotropia. Because there was no bifocal comparison group we cannot determine if SVL are equally effective. The results do indicate that SVL are an acceptable form of treatment for patients with high AC/A esotropia.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

INTRODUCTION: Management of high AC/A includes bifocal lenses, single-vision distance lenses, and surgery. Our goal was to determine the long-term outcome of single-vision lenses (SVL) for high AC/A esotropia compared with normal AC/A ET. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with accommodative esotropia managed with SVL and a minimum 5 years of follow-up. AC/A ratio, size and control of esotropic angle, stereopsis, refractive error, and ability to control the deviation while the prescription was being weaned were measured. A study group with high AC/A esotropia was compared with a control group with refractive esotropia and a normal AC/A ratio. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients were enrolled in this study: 22 in the study group and 14 in the control group. All patients in both groups showed improvement in at least one outcome category. One patient showed deterioration in only one category. CONCLUSION: High improvement and low deterioration rates suggest that SVL are an effective treatment for high AC/A esotropia. Because there was no bifocal comparison group we cannot determine if SVL are equally effective. The results do indicate that SVL are an acceptable form of treatment for patients with high AC/A esotropia.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

INTRODUCTION: Management of high AC/A includes bifocal lenses, single-vision distance lenses, and surgery. Our goal was to determine the long-term outcome of single-vision lenses (SVL) for high AC/A esotropia compared with normal AC/A ET. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with accommodative esotropia managed with SVL and a minimum 5 years of follow-up. AC/A ratio, size and control of esotropic angle, stereopsis, refractive error, and ability to control the deviation while the prescription was being weaned were measured. A study group with high AC/A esotropia was compared with a control group with refractive esotropia and a normal AC/A ratio. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients were enrolled in this study: 22 in the study group and 14 in the control group. All patients in both groups showed improvement in at least one outcome category. One patient showed deterioration in only one category. CONCLUSION: High improvement and low deterioration rates suggest that SVL are an effective treatment for high AC/A esotropia. Because there was no bifocal comparison group we cannot determine if SVL are equally effective. The results do indicate that SVL are an acceptable form of treatment for patients with high AC/A esotropia.

Key concepts: Esotropia, Ophthalmology, Medicine, Refractive error, Optometry, Strabismus, Surgery, Eye disease

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Single-Vision Lenses: A Comparison of Management of High AC/A Esotropia and Refractive Esotropia — Research Paper | ScholarLens