2017•Unpublished venueRequires access

Academic Dishonesty

Donald Louis McCabe, Linda Klebe Treviño

Open publisher page 731 citations

Abstract

Research and media reports have established the continued pervasiveness of academic dishonesty among students on America&s;s college campuses. While some colleges have responded with academic integrity classes and increased efforts to convince reluctant faculty members to report student cheaters, there is a renewed interest in the concept of "community" as an effective foundation for campus governance. Academic integrity policies can differ significantly in their content and in the manner in which they are communicated. As a result, important differences are likely to be found in the understanding and acceptance of these policies on different campuses. The hypotheses were tested using a sample of 6,096 students from thirty-one US colleges and universities. Initial sample selection focused on thirty-three institutions that had participated in a conference on honor systems held at Princeton University in 1988, and fourteen institutions with honor codes ultimately indicated a willingness to participate.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Research and media reports have established the continued pervasiveness of academic dishonesty among students on America&s;s college campuses. While some colleges have responded with academic integrity classes and increased efforts to convince reluctant faculty members to report student cheaters, there is a renewed interest in the concept of "community" as an effective foundation for campus governance. Academic integrity policies can differ significantly in their content and in the manner in which they are communicated. As a result, important differences are likely to be found in the understanding and acceptance of these policies on different campuses. The hypotheses were tested using a sample of 6,096 students from thirty-one US colleges and universities. Initial sample selection focused on thirty-three institutions that had participated in a conference on honor systems held at Princeton University in 1988, and fourteen institutions with honor codes ultimately indicated a willingness to participate.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 731 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Research and media reports have established the continued pervasiveness of academic dishonesty among students on America&s;s college campuses. While some colleges have responded with academic integrity classes and increased efforts to convince reluctant faculty members to report student cheaters, there is a renewed interest in the concept of "community" as an effective foundation for campus governance. Academic integrity policies can differ significantly in their content and in the manner in which they are communicated. As a result, important differences are likely to be found in the understanding and acceptance of these policies on different campuses. The hypotheses were tested using a sample of 6,096 students from thirty-one US colleges and universities. Initial sample selection focused on thirty-three institutions that had participated in a conference on honor systems held at Princeton University in 1988, and fourteen institutions with honor codes ultimately indicated a willingness to participate.

Key concepts: Academic dishonesty, Dishonesty, Psychology, Political science, Sociology, Cheating, Social psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Academic Dishonesty — Research Paper | ScholarLens