2014Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceOpen access

Industries TFP and Environmental Regulation Cost Analysis Using Malmquist–Luenberger

Chunlan Liu, Haiyan Wang

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Environmental problem is a worldwide focus, so as the effect of environmental regulation on economic. In this paper, we constructed a model including energy consumption and integrated pollutant emissions of Three wastes as bad output. This paper used Malmquist –Luenberger based on directional distance function to measure TFP and environmental regulation cost of Chinese 36 industries from 2001 to 2010. The result was that: From the overall analysis, the TFP was lower after considering the environmental regulation. Technological progress was the main driver of productivity growth. Environmental regulation br ought about a certain cost; from the industry analysis, there were some differences between industries on TFP growth and the cost of environmental regulation. T he monopoly and heavy industries were the focus in the industry ; from the annual analysis, TFP increased during Eleventh Five-Year Plan period, mainly drive d by technological progress.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Environmental problem is a worldwide focus, so as the effect of environmental regulation on economic. In this paper, we constructed a model including energy consumption and integrated pollutant emissions of Three wastes as bad output. This paper used Malmquist –Luenberger based on directional distance function to measure TFP and environmental regulation cost of Chinese 36 industries from 2001 to 2010. The result was that: From the overall analysis, the TFP was lower after considering the environmental regulation. Technological progress was the main driver of productivity growth. Environmental regulation br ought about a certain cost; from the industry analysis, there were some differences between industries on TFP growth and the cost of environmental regulation. T he monopoly and heavy industries were the focus in the industry ; from the annual analysis, TFP increased during Eleventh Five-Year Plan period, mainly drive d by technological progress.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Environmental problem is a worldwide focus, so as the effect of environmental regulation on economic. In this paper, we constructed a model including energy consumption and integrated pollutant emissions of Three wastes as bad output. This paper used Malmquist –Luenberger based on directional distance function to measure TFP and environmental regulation cost of Chinese 36 industries from 2001 to 2010. The result was that: From the overall analysis, the TFP was lower after considering the environmental regulation. Technological progress was the main driver of productivity growth. Environmental regulation br ought about a certain cost; from the industry analysis, there were some differences between industries on TFP growth and the cost of environmental regulation. T he monopoly and heavy industries were the focus in the industry ; from the annual analysis, TFP increased during Eleventh Five-Year Plan period, mainly drive d by technological progress.

Key concepts: Total factor productivity, Economics, Environmental regulation, Technical progress, Productivity, Monopoly, Technological change, Natural resource economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Industries TFP and Environmental Regulation Cost Analysis Using Malmquist–Luenberger — Research Paper | ScholarLens