1969JAMARequires access

A Complication Of Circumcision

Andrew J. McGowan

Open publisher page 18 citations

Abstract

To the Editor:— A serious complication of circ[ill]cision unmentioned in the refere[ill]s given by Lackey et al (206:2318, 1968) is that of surgically bivalving either the dorsal or ventral half of the glans penis. This is caused by inadvertent placement of one limb of the scissors into the urethra rather than between the foreskin and the glans prior to performing either the dorsal or ventral slit in the prepuce. These fortunately rare cases are those with pinpoint openings in the phimotic foreskin with the glandular meatus just beneath. If the adhesions of the inner surface of the foreskin and glans penis are not reduced, the line of least resistance to placement of instrument within the foreskin is the urethra itself. Once the incision is made, the glans penis is bivalved and the urethra laid open. In effect, a first degree hypospadius or epispadius has been produced. While avoidance of

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To the Editor:— A serious complication of circ[ill]cision unmentioned in the refere[ill]s given by Lackey et al (206:2318, 1968) is that of surgically bivalving either the dorsal or ventral half of the glans penis. This is caused by inadvertent placement of one limb of the scissors into the urethra rather than between the foreskin and the glans prior to performing either the dorsal or ventral slit in the prepuce. These fortunately rare cases are those with pinpoint openings in the phimotic foreskin with the glandular meatus just beneath. If the adhesions of the inner surface of the foreskin and glans penis are not reduced, the line of least resistance to placement of instrument within the foreskin is the urethra itself. Once the incision is made, the glans penis is bivalved and the urethra laid open. In effect, a first degree hypospadius or epispadius has been produced. While avoidance of

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To the Editor:— A serious complication of circ[ill]cision unmentioned in the refere[ill]s given by Lackey et al (206:2318, 1968) is that of surgically bivalving either the dorsal or ventral half of the glans penis. This is caused by inadvertent placement of one limb of the scissors into the urethra rather than between the foreskin and the glans prior to performing either the dorsal or ventral slit in the prepuce. These fortunately rare cases are those with pinpoint openings in the phimotic foreskin with the glandular meatus just beneath. If the adhesions of the inner surface of the foreskin and glans penis are not reduced, the line of least resistance to placement of instrument within the foreskin is the urethra itself. Once the incision is made, the glans penis is bivalved and the urethra laid open. In effect, a first degree hypospadius or epispadius has been produced. While avoidance of

Key concepts: Medicine, Complication, MEDLINE, General surgery, Surgery, Law, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Complication Of Circumcision — Research Paper | ScholarLens