2008Journal of GlaucomaRequires access

Ocular Pulse Amplitude in Normal Tension and Primary Open Angle Glaucoma

Ingeborg Stalmans, Alon Harris, Veerle Vanbellinghen, Thierry Zeyen, Brent Siesky

Open publisher page 54 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: (1) To investigate the relationship of ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) with intraocular pressure (IOP) and corneal thickness. (2) To evaluate OPA in patients with primary open angle and normal tension glaucoma (NTG). METHODS: Patients with NTG (n=28), primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) (n=19), and age-matched healthy controls (n=22) underwent 2 consecutive Goldmann and dynamic contour tonometry measurements within 1 month. Central corneal thickness was also measured. A regression model was applied to compare OPA between the diagnostic groups. RESULTS: OPA increased with rising IOP (slope 0.026/0.033 and P=0.002/<0.0001 for Goldmann/Dynamic tonometry), whereas corneal thickness did not influence pulse amplitude measurements (slope-0.0017/-0.0013 and P=0.11/0.21 after correction for Goldmann/Dynamic tonometry). In a multivariate model correcting for IOP and corneal thickness, OPA was reduced in patients with NTG (P=0.014/0.017 corrected for Goldmann/Dynamic tonometry) or POAG (P=0.015/0.014). CONCLUSIONS: OPA is reduced in normal tension and POAG patients compared with healthy controls. OPA is influenced by IOP, but not by corneal thickness.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: (1) To investigate the relationship of ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) with intraocular pressure (IOP) and corneal thickness. (2) To evaluate OPA in patients with primary open angle and normal tension glaucoma (NTG). METHODS: Patients with NTG (n=28), primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) (n=19), and age-matched healthy controls (n=22) underwent 2 consecutive Goldmann and dynamic contour tonometry measurements within 1 month. Central corneal thickness was also measured. A regression model was applied to compare OPA between the diagnostic groups. RESULTS: OPA increased with rising IOP (slope 0.026/0.033 and P=0.002/<0.0001 for Goldmann/Dynamic tonometry), whereas corneal thickness did not influence pulse amplitude measurements (slope-0.0017/-0.0013 and P=0.11/0.21 after correction for Goldmann/Dynamic tonometry). In a multivariate model correcting for IOP and corneal thickness, OPA was reduced in patients with NTG (P=0.014/0.017 corrected for Goldmann/Dynamic tonometry) or POAG (P=0.015/0.014). CONCLUSIONS: OPA is reduced in normal tension and POAG patients compared with healthy controls. OPA is influenced by IOP, but not by corneal thickness.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 54 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: (1) To investigate the relationship of ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) with intraocular pressure (IOP) and corneal thickness. (2) To evaluate OPA in patients with primary open angle and normal tension glaucoma (NTG). METHODS: Patients with NTG (n=28), primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) (n=19), and age-matched healthy controls (n=22) underwent 2 consecutive Goldmann and dynamic contour tonometry measurements within 1 month. Central corneal thickness was also measured. A regression model was applied to compare OPA between the diagnostic groups. RESULTS: OPA increased with rising IOP (slope 0.026/0.033 and P=0.002/<0.0001 for Goldmann/Dynamic tonometry), whereas corneal thickness did not influence pulse amplitude measurements (slope-0.0017/-0.0013 and P=0.11/0.21 after correction for Goldmann/Dynamic tonometry). In a multivariate model correcting for IOP and corneal thickness, OPA was reduced in patients with NTG (P=0.014/0.017 corrected for Goldmann/Dynamic tonometry) or POAG (P=0.015/0.014). CONCLUSIONS: OPA is reduced in normal tension and POAG patients compared with healthy controls. OPA is influenced by IOP, but not by corneal thickness.

Key concepts: Normal tension glaucoma, Ophthalmology, Medicine, Open angle glaucoma, Intraocular pressure, Glaucoma

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ocular Pulse Amplitude in Normal Tension and Primary Open Angle Glaucoma — Research Paper | ScholarLens