1999Schizophrenia BulletinRequires access

Sensory Gating in Rats: Lack of Correlation Between Auditory Evoked Potential Gating and Prepulse Inhibition

Bart Ellenbroek, Gilles van Luijtelaar, M. Frenken, A.R. Cools

Open publisher page 40 citations

Abstract

This study was designed to evaluate the possible similarities between two paradigms designed to measure sensory gating: (1) an auditory evoked potential (AEP), called the P50 gating paradigm; and (2) an acoustic startle (ASR), called the prepulse inhibition paradigm. These paradigms show a number of methodological, pharmacological, and neurobiological similarities, and they are both disturbed in patients with schizophrenia. In the first of three experiments, the AEP gating and the ASR gating were measured in rats. Although both AEP and ASR gating could readily be obtained, there appeared to be no correlation between the performance in these two paradigms. This lack of correlation was confirmed using a factor analytical approach, where the AEP gating and the ASR gating parameters were found to load on different factors. In the second experiment, the interstimulus interval in the ASR paradigm was increased to 500 ms (identical to the interstimulus interval of the AEP gating paradigm). This increase reduced the degree of ASR gating, although some gating could still be obtained. Again no correlation was found between AEP and ASR gating, and this was again confirmed by the factorial analysis. In the final experiment, the effects of the dopamine D2/3 agonist 7-OHDPAT were evaluated in both paradigms. This selective agonist dose dependently reduced ASR gating but had no effect on AEP gating. Together, these data strongly suggest that AEP and ASR gating measure two different aspects of information processing and indicate that both paradigms may be important for investigating the neurobiological disturbances observed in patients with psychoses.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study was designed to evaluate the possible similarities between two paradigms designed to measure sensory gating: (1) an auditory evoked potential (AEP), called the P50 gating paradigm; and (2) an acoustic startle (ASR), called the prepulse inhibition paradigm. These paradigms show a number of methodological, pharmacological, and neurobiological similarities, and they are both disturbed in patients with schizophrenia. In the first of three experiments, the AEP gating and the ASR gating were measured in rats. Although both AEP and ASR gating could readily be obtained, there appeared to be no correlation between the performance in these two paradigms. This lack of correlation was confirmed using a factor analytical approach, where the AEP gating and the ASR gating parameters were found to load on different factors. In the second experiment, the interstimulus interval in the ASR paradigm was increased to 500 ms (identical to the interstimulus interval of the AEP gating paradigm). This increase reduced the degree of ASR gating, although some gating could still be obtained. Again no correlation was found between AEP and ASR gating, and this was again confirmed by the factorial analysis. In the final experiment, the effects of the dopamine D2/3 agonist 7-OHDPAT were evaluated in both paradigms. This selective agonist dose dependently reduced ASR gating but had no effect on AEP gating. Together, these data strongly suggest that AEP and ASR gating measure two different aspects of information processing and indicate that both paradigms may be important for investigating the neurobiological disturbances observed in patients with psychoses.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 40 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study was designed to evaluate the possible similarities between two paradigms designed to measure sensory gating: (1) an auditory evoked potential (AEP), called the P50 gating paradigm; and (2) an acoustic startle (ASR), called the prepulse inhibition paradigm. These paradigms show a number of methodological, pharmacological, and neurobiological similarities, and they are both disturbed in patients with schizophrenia. In the first of three experiments, the AEP gating and the ASR gating were measured in rats. Although both AEP and ASR gating could readily be obtained, there appeared to be no correlation between the performance in these two paradigms. This lack of correlation was confirmed using a factor analytical approach, where the AEP gating and the ASR gating parameters were found to load on different factors. In the second experiment, the interstimulus interval in the ASR paradigm was increased to 500 ms (identical to the interstimulus interval of the AEP gating paradigm). This increase reduced the degree of ASR gating, although some gating could still be obtained. Again no correlation was found between AEP and ASR gating, and this was again confirmed by the factorial analysis. In the final experiment, the effects of the dopamine D2/3 agonist 7-OHDPAT were evaluated in both paradigms. This selective agonist dose dependently reduced ASR gating but had no effect on AEP gating. Together, these data strongly suggest that AEP and ASR gating measure two different aspects of information processing and indicate that both paradigms may be important for investigating the neurobiological disturbances observed in patients with psychoses.

Key concepts: Gating, Sensory gating, Prepulse inhibition, Startle response, Interstimulus interval, Audiology, Neuroscience, Correlation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sensory Gating in Rats: Lack of Correlation Between Auditory Evoked Potential Gating and Prepulse Inhibition — Research Paper | ScholarLens