2007Archives of AndrologyRequires access

The Benefits and Limitations of the Sperm Quality Analyzer IIB in Assessing Porcine Sperm Motility

Phillip Matson, Sandra Webb, Wendy Kappelle, Brenton R. Clarke

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

The Sperm Quality Analyzer (SQA) IIB, a member of the SQA-II family of machines which uses the scatter of light by sperm as an indicator of sperm motility, was systematically evaluated as a means of analyzing objectively the motility of porcine epididymal sperm. The sperm motility (%) and the Sperm Motility Index (SMI) are calculated by the machine using pre-programmed algorithms designed for human sperm. The machine performed well and was able to detect changes in sperm motility under experimental conditions. However, two major limitations of this machine were identified, (i) the readings obtained were influenced by the concentration of the sperm suspension despite the actual sperm motility remaining constant, and (ii) the machine was unable to differentiate between progressive and non-progressive motility. It should therefore be recognized that (a) the sperm concentration must be kept constant in studies in vitro if differences between treatment groups are to be identified, and (b) the inability to separate progressive motility from that of total motility will restrict the usefulness of this and similar machines to studies monitoring changes in total motility alone.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Sperm Quality Analyzer (SQA) IIB, a member of the SQA-II family of machines which uses the scatter of light by sperm as an indicator of sperm motility, was systematically evaluated as a means of analyzing objectively the motility of porcine epididymal sperm. The sperm motility (%) and the Sperm Motility Index (SMI) are calculated by the machine using pre-programmed algorithms designed for human sperm. The machine performed well and was able to detect changes in sperm motility under experimental conditions. However, two major limitations of this machine were identified, (i) the readings obtained were influenced by the concentration of the sperm suspension despite the actual sperm motility remaining constant, and (ii) the machine was unable to differentiate between progressive and non-progressive motility. It should therefore be recognized that (a) the sperm concentration must be kept constant in studies in vitro if differences between treatment groups are to be identified, and (b) the inability to separate progressive motility from that of total motility will restrict the usefulness of this and similar machines to studies monitoring changes in total motility alone.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Sperm Quality Analyzer (SQA) IIB, a member of the SQA-II family of machines which uses the scatter of light by sperm as an indicator of sperm motility, was systematically evaluated as a means of analyzing objectively the motility of porcine epididymal sperm. The sperm motility (%) and the Sperm Motility Index (SMI) are calculated by the machine using pre-programmed algorithms designed for human sperm. The machine performed well and was able to detect changes in sperm motility under experimental conditions. However, two major limitations of this machine were identified, (i) the readings obtained were influenced by the concentration of the sperm suspension despite the actual sperm motility remaining constant, and (ii) the machine was unable to differentiate between progressive and non-progressive motility. It should therefore be recognized that (a) the sperm concentration must be kept constant in studies in vitro if differences between treatment groups are to be identified, and (b) the inability to separate progressive motility from that of total motility will restrict the usefulness of this and similar machines to studies monitoring changes in total motility alone.

Key concepts: Motility, Sperm motility, Sperm, Andrology, Sperm quality, Biology, Cell biology, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Benefits and Limitations of the Sperm Quality Analyzer IIB in Assessing Porcine Sperm Motility — Research Paper | ScholarLens