2005PancreasRequires access

EFFICACY AND FEASIBILITY OF A FIXED-DOSE RATE INFUSION OF LOW-DOSE GEMCITABINE IN PANCREATIC CANCER

Takayuki Aimoto, Emma Uchida, Yosuke Nakamura, Akira Katsuno, K Cho, Takehiro Tajiri

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Gemcitabine (GEM) has been reported to be an active agent in pancreatic cancer. Single-agent gemcitabine is currently the chemotherapy standard, although response rate being modest. Therefore, studies over the past few years have focused on gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy and recent applications have included the use of a fixed-dose rate regimen. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a new regimen, a fix-dose rate infusion of low-dose GEM (FRI regimen), as compared with a standard infusion (SI regimen) in patients with pancreatic cancer. 27 patients were enrolled (12 patients were resectable and 15 patients were unresectable). This FRI regimen consisted of gemcitabine 300 mg/m2 i.v. 30 minutes once weekly (10 mg/m2/min). Among unresectable patients, partial response was observed each in one patient, while stable disease was seen in four and five patients (FRI versus SI), respectively. A CBR was achieved in three versus two patients. As side effects, grade 3 toxicities were not observed in patients treated with the FRI regimen. The median survival time was 10 months versus 8 months, and this survival difference is not statistical significant. In the adjuvant setting with GEM, 5 of 7 patients treated with the SI regimen discontinued the treatment within 3 cycles because of severe grade 3 or 4 toxicities in spite of dose reduction, while all patients with FRI regimen achieved the entire treatment. The median survival time and disease-free survival time were no significant difference between two groups. In conclusion, the FRI regimen is well tolerated and offers good palliation, as well as the SI regimen, in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, in the adjuvant setting, the FRI regimen resulted in better clinical benefit on quality of life and fewer side effects than the SI regimen.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Gemcitabine (GEM) has been reported to be an active agent in pancreatic cancer. Single-agent gemcitabine is currently the chemotherapy standard, although response rate being modest. Therefore, studies over the past few years have focused on gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy and recent applications have included the use of a fixed-dose rate regimen. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a new regimen, a fix-dose rate infusion of low-dose GEM (FRI regimen), as compared with a standard infusion (SI regimen) in patients with pancreatic cancer. 27 patients were enrolled (12 patients were resectable and 15 patients were unresectable). This FRI regimen consisted of gemcitabine 300 mg/m2 i.v. 30 minutes once weekly (10 mg/m2/min). Among unresectable patients, partial response was observed each in one patient, while stable disease was seen in four and five patients (FRI versus SI), respectively. A CBR was achieved in three versus two patients. As side effects, grade 3 toxicities were not observed in patients treated with the FRI regimen. The median survival time was 10 months versus 8 months, and this survival difference is not statistical significant. In the adjuvant setting with GEM, 5 of 7 patients treated with the SI regimen discontinued the treatment within 3 cycles because of severe grade 3 or 4 toxicities in spite of dose reduction, while all patients with FRI regimen achieved the entire treatment. The median survival time and disease-free survival time were no significant difference between two groups. In conclusion, the FRI regimen is well tolerated and offers good palliation, as well as the SI regimen, in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, in the adjuvant setting, the FRI regimen resulted in better clinical benefit on quality of life and fewer side effects than the SI regimen.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Gemcitabine (GEM) has been reported to be an active agent in pancreatic cancer. Single-agent gemcitabine is currently the chemotherapy standard, although response rate being modest. Therefore, studies over the past few years have focused on gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy and recent applications have included the use of a fixed-dose rate regimen. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a new regimen, a fix-dose rate infusion of low-dose GEM (FRI regimen), as compared with a standard infusion (SI regimen) in patients with pancreatic cancer. 27 patients were enrolled (12 patients were resectable and 15 patients were unresectable). This FRI regimen consisted of gemcitabine 300 mg/m2 i.v. 30 minutes once weekly (10 mg/m2/min). Among unresectable patients, partial response was observed each in one patient, while stable disease was seen in four and five patients (FRI versus SI), respectively. A CBR was achieved in three versus two patients. As side effects, grade 3 toxicities were not observed in patients treated with the FRI regimen. The median survival time was 10 months versus 8 months, and this survival difference is not statistical significant. In the adjuvant setting with GEM, 5 of 7 patients treated with the SI regimen discontinued the treatment within 3 cycles because of severe grade 3 or 4 toxicities in spite of dose reduction, while all patients with FRI regimen achieved the entire treatment. The median survival time and disease-free survival time were no significant difference between two groups. In conclusion, the FRI regimen is well tolerated and offers good palliation, as well as the SI regimen, in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, in the adjuvant setting, the FRI regimen resulted in better clinical benefit on quality of life and fewer side effects than the SI regimen.

Key concepts: Gemcitabine, Regimen, Medicine, Pancreatic cancer, Chemotherapy, Internal medicine, Survival rate, Gastroenterology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EFFICACY AND FEASIBILITY OF A FIXED-DOSE RATE INFUSION OF LOW-DOSE GEMCITABINE IN PANCREATIC CANCER — Research Paper | ScholarLens