2009•Procedia - Social and Behavioral SciencesOpen access

Operational priorities of instructional designers analyzed within the steps of the Addie instructional design model

Zehra Özdilek, Edward Robeck

Open full text 58 citations

Abstract

To investigate the operational priorities of instructional designers, a thematic content analysis was conducted of responses to an online survey that was completed by 29 instructional designers. The instructional designers work in various areas of education (e.g., adult learning, K-12 science, educational technology) and are from several countries. The survey questions asked about the areas of design considered most important and other aspects of the respondents’ professional work. The responses were coded using the five primary steps of the ADDIE instructional development model. It was concluded that instructional designers indicated the highest levels of concern for elements within the Analysis step of the ADDIE model. Further, within the Analysis step, much more attention is given to learner characteristics than to other considerations. These results indicate that in the instructional design process some elements relevant to instruction may receive more attention than others and, therefore, may be emphasized as changes in instructional design models proceed. Areas receiving less attention, such as identifying the reasons learners need to study the content of instruction and various contextual considerations, which can have an important impact on the overall design approach and effectiveness of instruction, may be given less attention in ID innovations.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To investigate the operational priorities of instructional designers, a thematic content analysis was conducted of responses to an online survey that was completed by 29 instructional designers. The instructional designers work in various areas of education (e.g., adult learning, K-12 science, educational technology) and are from several countries. The survey questions asked about the areas of design considered most important and other aspects of the respondents’ professional work. The responses were coded using the five primary steps of the ADDIE instructional development model. It was concluded that instructional designers indicated the highest levels of concern for elements within the Analysis step of the ADDIE model. Further, within the Analysis step, much more attention is given to learner characteristics than to other considerations. These results indicate that in the instructional design process some elements relevant to instruction may receive more attention than others and, therefore, may be emphasized as changes in instructional design models proceed. Areas receiving less attention, such as identifying the reasons learners need to study the content of instruction and various contextual considerations, which can have an important impact on the overall design approach and effectiveness of instruction, may be given less attention in ID innovations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 58 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To investigate the operational priorities of instructional designers, a thematic content analysis was conducted of responses to an online survey that was completed by 29 instructional designers. The instructional designers work in various areas of education (e.g., adult learning, K-12 science, educational technology) and are from several countries. The survey questions asked about the areas of design considered most important and other aspects of the respondents’ professional work. The responses were coded using the five primary steps of the ADDIE instructional development model. It was concluded that instructional designers indicated the highest levels of concern for elements within the Analysis step of the ADDIE model. Further, within the Analysis step, much more attention is given to learner characteristics than to other considerations. These results indicate that in the instructional design process some elements relevant to instruction may receive more attention than others and, therefore, may be emphasized as changes in instructional design models proceed. Areas receiving less attention, such as identifying the reasons learners need to study the content of instruction and various contextual considerations, which can have an important impact on the overall design approach and effectiveness of instruction, may be given less attention in ID innovations.

Key concepts: ADDIE Model, Instructional design, Computer science, Thematic analysis, Process (computing), Instructional simulation, Mathematics education, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Operational priorities of instructional designers analyzed within the steps of the Addie instructional design model — Research Paper | ScholarLens