1981Journal of Clinical PathologyOpen access

Role of laboratory chemosensitivity testing in the selection of cancer chemotherapy for individual patients.

Peter J. Selby, Derek Raghavan

Open full text 19 citations

Abstract

Recently several assays have been developed which allow the growth of colonies from cell suspensions prepared from human tumour biopsy specimens. It has been suggested that such assays will provide a reliable means of measuring the chemosensitivity of human tumours for predicting the response to treatment in patients. We have briefly reviewed the previous, largely unsuccessful, attempts at chemosensitivity testing and the potential place of the new assays. The measurement of the survival of clonogenic tumour cells after cytotoxic treatment probably reflects to some extent the survival of cells which in vivo are capable of proliferating to repopulate and regrow the tumour. This endpoint therefore has advantages over alternatives that do not directly measure reproductive cell death, and the assays also have the advantage of suppressing the growth of many non-malignant cells found in tumours. However, technical problems such as the preparation of cell suspensions and the artificial nature of the drug exposure phase of the assays have not been completely overcome and the plating efficiencies remain low in most systems. Work with model systems such as human tumour xenografts tends to support the usefulness of the assays but also highlights some difficulties. Clinical studies of chemosensitivity testing are in progress and initial results are encouraging but inconclusive.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Recently several assays have been developed which allow the growth of colonies from cell suspensions prepared from human tumour biopsy specimens. It has been suggested that such assays will provide a reliable means of measuring the chemosensitivity of human tumours for predicting the response to treatment in patients. We have briefly reviewed the previous, largely unsuccessful, attempts at chemosensitivity testing and the potential place of the new assays. The measurement of the survival of clonogenic tumour cells after cytotoxic treatment probably reflects to some extent the survival of cells which in vivo are capable of proliferating to repopulate and regrow the tumour. This endpoint therefore has advantages over alternatives that do not directly measure reproductive cell death, and the assays also have the advantage of suppressing the growth of many non-malignant cells found in tumours. However, technical problems such as the preparation of cell suspensions and the artificial nature of the drug exposure phase of the assays have not been completely overcome and the plating efficiencies remain low in most systems. Work with model systems such as human tumour xenografts tends to support the usefulness of the assays but also highlights some difficulties. Clinical studies of chemosensitivity testing are in progress and initial results are encouraging but inconclusive.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Recently several assays have been developed which allow the growth of colonies from cell suspensions prepared from human tumour biopsy specimens. It has been suggested that such assays will provide a reliable means of measuring the chemosensitivity of human tumours for predicting the response to treatment in patients. We have briefly reviewed the previous, largely unsuccessful, attempts at chemosensitivity testing and the potential place of the new assays. The measurement of the survival of clonogenic tumour cells after cytotoxic treatment probably reflects to some extent the survival of cells which in vivo are capable of proliferating to repopulate and regrow the tumour. This endpoint therefore has advantages over alternatives that do not directly measure reproductive cell death, and the assays also have the advantage of suppressing the growth of many non-malignant cells found in tumours. However, technical problems such as the preparation of cell suspensions and the artificial nature of the drug exposure phase of the assays have not been completely overcome and the plating efficiencies remain low in most systems. Work with model systems such as human tumour xenografts tends to support the usefulness of the assays but also highlights some difficulties. Clinical studies of chemosensitivity testing are in progress and initial results are encouraging but inconclusive.

Key concepts: Chemosensitivity assay, Clonogenic assay, In vivo, Cancer research, Cancer cell, Chemotherapy, Cancer, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Role of laboratory chemosensitivity testing in the selection of cancer chemotherapy for individual patients. — Research Paper | ScholarLens