2011•International Journal of Procurement ManagementRequires access

On supply chains and reputation risk: tracking changes in supplier codes of conduct

Gregory M. Magnan, Stanley E. Fawcett, Talia N. Alcantar, Kenneth Michael Henshaw

Open publisher page 21 citations

Abstract

Increasingly, consumers and professional buyers are reluctant to purchase goods and services from firms that produced those goods and services in irresponsible ways, including the use of child and forced labour, unsafe working conditions, and processes which damage the environment. The reputations of firms that operate or source from irresponsible factories are increasingly at risk and, consequently, firms are taking steps to mitigate those risks. Supplier codes of conduct are part of a set of tools used to ensure that business practices at suppliers’ facilities are acceptable to buying firms and their stakeholders. Given the relatively recent existence and rapid growth of conduct codes, this paper addresses how their content has changed over time. A longitudinal analysis indicates that supplier codes of conduct are: becoming more explicit in defining transgressions and out-of-compliance situations, incorporating a broader array of human rights provisions, and using language that leads to working together to fix problems, rather than moving business out of suppliers.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Increasingly, consumers and professional buyers are reluctant to purchase goods and services from firms that produced those goods and services in irresponsible ways, including the use of child and forced labour, unsafe working conditions, and processes which damage the environment. The reputations of firms that operate or source from irresponsible factories are increasingly at risk and, consequently, firms are taking steps to mitigate those risks. Supplier codes of conduct are part of a set of tools used to ensure that business practices at suppliers’ facilities are acceptable to buying firms and their stakeholders. Given the relatively recent existence and rapid growth of conduct codes, this paper addresses how their content has changed over time. A longitudinal analysis indicates that supplier codes of conduct are: becoming more explicit in defining transgressions and out-of-compliance situations, incorporating a broader array of human rights provisions, and using language that leads to working together to fix problems, rather than moving business out of suppliers.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Increasingly, consumers and professional buyers are reluctant to purchase goods and services from firms that produced those goods and services in irresponsible ways, including the use of child and forced labour, unsafe working conditions, and processes which damage the environment. The reputations of firms that operate or source from irresponsible factories are increasingly at risk and, consequently, firms are taking steps to mitigate those risks. Supplier codes of conduct are part of a set of tools used to ensure that business practices at suppliers’ facilities are acceptable to buying firms and their stakeholders. Given the relatively recent existence and rapid growth of conduct codes, this paper addresses how their content has changed over time. A longitudinal analysis indicates that supplier codes of conduct are: becoming more explicit in defining transgressions and out-of-compliance situations, incorporating a broader array of human rights provisions, and using language that leads to working together to fix problems, rather than moving business out of suppliers.

Key concepts: Reputation, Business, Supply chain, Set (abstract data type), Marketing, Industrial organization, Law, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On supply chains and reputation risk: tracking changes in supplier codes of conduct — Research Paper | ScholarLens