2009Contemporary Economic PolicyRequires access

THE UNEMPLOYMENT PARADIGMS REVISITED: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF U.S. STATE AND EUROPEAN UNEMPLOYMENT

Diego Romero‐Ávila, Carlos Usabiaga

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

This article tests the main unemployment paradigms for the unemployment rates of the states of the United States and the European Union–15 countries over the past three decades. For that purpose, we employ a state‐of‐the‐art panel stationarity test, which allows for an unknown number of endogenous structural breaks as well as for cross‐sectional correlation. Overall, our analysis renders clear‐cut evidence in favor of regime‐wise stationarity in U.S. state unemployment, while hysteresis in European unemployment. Interestingly, the timing of the breaks broadly coincides with major macroeconomic shocks mainly associated with the oil crises of the 1970s and marked changes in interest rates in the 1980s and early 1990s. Based on our results, we draw some policy prescriptions that point to the need for greater flexibility in the European labor markets. (JEL C23, E24)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article tests the main unemployment paradigms for the unemployment rates of the states of the United States and the European Union–15 countries over the past three decades. For that purpose, we employ a state‐of‐the‐art panel stationarity test, which allows for an unknown number of endogenous structural breaks as well as for cross‐sectional correlation. Overall, our analysis renders clear‐cut evidence in favor of regime‐wise stationarity in U.S. state unemployment, while hysteresis in European unemployment. Interestingly, the timing of the breaks broadly coincides with major macroeconomic shocks mainly associated with the oil crises of the 1970s and marked changes in interest rates in the 1980s and early 1990s. Based on our results, we draw some policy prescriptions that point to the need for greater flexibility in the European labor markets. (JEL C23, E24)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article tests the main unemployment paradigms for the unemployment rates of the states of the United States and the European Union–15 countries over the past three decades. For that purpose, we employ a state‐of‐the‐art panel stationarity test, which allows for an unknown number of endogenous structural breaks as well as for cross‐sectional correlation. Overall, our analysis renders clear‐cut evidence in favor of regime‐wise stationarity in U.S. state unemployment, while hysteresis in European unemployment. Interestingly, the timing of the breaks broadly coincides with major macroeconomic shocks mainly associated with the oil crises of the 1970s and marked changes in interest rates in the 1980s and early 1990s. Based on our results, we draw some policy prescriptions that point to the need for greater flexibility in the European labor markets. (JEL C23, E24)

Key concepts: Unemployment, Economics, Hysteresis, European union, Flexibility (engineering), Full employment, Macroeconomics, International economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
THE UNEMPLOYMENT PARADIGMS REVISITED: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF U.S. STATE AND EUROPEAN UNEMPLOYMENT — Research Paper | ScholarLens