1981•SPE California Regional MeetingRequires access

CO2 Injection as an Immiscible Application for Enhanced Recovery in Heavy Oil Reservoirs

Ala K. Khatib, Robert C. Earlougher, Kutluyil Kantar

Open publisher page 75 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Most field applications and pilot tests of CO2 injection are for miscible drive, and are therefore confined to light oil reservoirs. However, it has been known for decades that as CO2 dissolves in heavy oil, it swells the oil and reduces its viscosity. Core displacement tests in the fifties indicated that substantial additional recovery of heavy oil, and in some cases light oil, was possible with carbonated water. Until recently, unfavorable economics discouraged field application, and yet in 1976 a field project was commenced in southern Arkansas. Two techniques have been field-tested. These are "huff-and-puff" CO2 injection for stimulation of the producing wells and either alternate or simultaneous injection of CO2 and water. Both process mechanisms are discussed and are illustrated, where possible, by the results of field tests in the United States. These have been in sandstone reservoirs containing light oils and heavy oils. Several other pilot or field projects are in the planning stage. A planned field demonstration project of both processes, in different test areas of a fractured limestone reservoir (oil 9° - 15°) in Turkey, is summarized. The possible range of candidate reservoirs is discussed, and general economic comparison with steam injection is given. The obvious candidates are heavy oil reservoirs that are too deep for current steam injection technology and economics.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ABSTRACT Most field applications and pilot tests of CO2 injection are for miscible drive, and are therefore confined to light oil reservoirs. However, it has been known for decades that as CO2 dissolves in heavy oil, it swells the oil and reduces its viscosity. Core displacement tests in the fifties indicated that substantial additional recovery of heavy oil, and in some cases light oil, was possible with carbonated water. Until recently, unfavorable economics discouraged field application, and yet in 1976 a field project was commenced in southern Arkansas. Two techniques have been field-tested. These are "huff-and-puff" CO2 injection for stimulation of the producing wells and either alternate or simultaneous injection of CO2 and water. Both process mechanisms are discussed and are illustrated, where possible, by the results of field tests in the United States. These have been in sandstone reservoirs containing light oils and heavy oils. Several other pilot or field projects are in the planning stage. A planned field demonstration project of both processes, in different test areas of a fractured limestone reservoir (oil 9° - 15°) in Turkey, is summarized. The possible range of candidate reservoirs is discussed, and general economic comparison with steam injection is given. The obvious candidates are heavy oil reservoirs that are too deep for current steam injection technology and economics.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 75 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ABSTRACT Most field applications and pilot tests of CO2 injection are for miscible drive, and are therefore confined to light oil reservoirs. However, it has been known for decades that as CO2 dissolves in heavy oil, it swells the oil and reduces its viscosity. Core displacement tests in the fifties indicated that substantial additional recovery of heavy oil, and in some cases light oil, was possible with carbonated water. Until recently, unfavorable economics discouraged field application, and yet in 1976 a field project was commenced in southern Arkansas. Two techniques have been field-tested. These are "huff-and-puff" CO2 injection for stimulation of the producing wells and either alternate or simultaneous injection of CO2 and water. Both process mechanisms are discussed and are illustrated, where possible, by the results of field tests in the United States. These have been in sandstone reservoirs containing light oils and heavy oils. Several other pilot or field projects are in the planning stage. A planned field demonstration project of both processes, in different test areas of a fractured limestone reservoir (oil 9° - 15°) in Turkey, is summarized. The possible range of candidate reservoirs is discussed, and general economic comparison with steam injection is given. The obvious candidates are heavy oil reservoirs that are too deep for current steam injection technology and economics.

Key concepts: Steam injection, Petroleum engineering, Water injection (oil production), Enhanced oil recovery, Oil field, Light crude oil, Environmental science, Swell

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
CO2 Injection as an Immiscible Application for Enhanced Recovery in Heavy Oil Reservoirs — Research Paper | ScholarLens