Decentralization Reform, Case of Albania
Fran Brahimi, Fiqiri Baholli, Nezir Haldeda, Ines Dika
Abstract
Open-access reader
Fran Brahimi, Fiqiri Baholli, Nezir Haldeda, Ines Dika
Abstract
Open-access reader
During the last two decades the process of decentralization has been extended worldwide. This process has taken place in developed countries but in nowadays, this process is also being applied in developing countries in order to challenge the monopoly of centralized decision making of governments. The decentralization reform in Albania has done progress during the transition period. Today the local governance in Albania is absorbing and implementing the decentralization legal framework which is approved up to now and also is moving toward a complicated but progressive process of decentralization and autonomy that combines the decentralization of functions/services with fiscal decentralization supported by the process of strengthening the local democracy and accountability through free election and local community participation. This practice is supported by the economic theory of decentralization that it is a process that can and should lead to the improvement of the services that citizens receive from government by balancing local needs and expectations regarding the quantity, quality, cost and mix of services. This paper makes a snapshot of the process of decentralization by evaluating what has already been achieved, what is in process and what are the challenges laid ahead. It does the analysis of fiscal decentralization and fiscal autonomy in Albania and also gives a short description about the European models (West and East European countries). This paper touches upon the main achievements and challenges on all the complex issues that relate to decentralization. It is mainly focused on the progress of decentralization during the last couple years. DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n10p524
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
During the last two decades the process of decentralization has been extended worldwide. This process has taken place in developed countries but in nowadays, this process is also being applied in developing countries in order to challenge the monopoly of centralized decision making of governments. The decentralization reform in Albania has done progress during the transition period. Today the local governance in Albania is absorbing and implementing the decentralization legal framework which is approved up to now and also is moving toward a complicated but progressive process of decentralization and autonomy that combines the decentralization of functions/services with fiscal decentralization supported by the process of strengthening the local democracy and accountability through free election and local community participation. This practice is supported by the economic theory of decentralization that it is a process that can and should lead to the improvement of the services that citizens receive from government by balancing local needs and expectations regarding the quantity, quality, cost and mix of services. This paper makes a snapshot of the process of decentralization by evaluating what has already been achieved, what is in process and what are the challenges laid ahead. It does the analysis of fiscal decentralization and fiscal autonomy in Albania and also gives a short description about the European models (West and East European countries). This paper touches upon the main achievements and challenges on all the complex issues that relate to decentralization. It is mainly focused on the progress of decentralization during the last couple years. DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n10p524
Key concepts: Decentralization, Accountability, Autonomy, Corporate governance, Local government, Process (computing), Government (linguistics), Economic system