Influences of trans‐polyoctylene rubber on the physical properties and phase morphology of natural rubber/acrylonitrile–butadiene rubber blends
Changwoon Nah, Seung‐Cheol Han, Byung‐Wook Jo, Wan Doo Kim, Young‐Wook Chang
Abstract
Changwoon Nah, Seung‐Cheol Han, Byung‐Wook Jo, Wan Doo Kim, Young‐Wook Chang
Abstract
Abstract The influence of trans‐polyoctylene rubber (TOR) on the mechanical properties, glass‐transition behavior, and phase morphology of natural rubber (NR)/acrylonitrile–butadiene rubber (NBR) blends was investigated. With an increased TOR level, hardness, tensile modulus, and resilience increased, whereas tensile strength and elongation at break tremendously decreased. According to differential scanning calorimetry and dynamic mechanical analysis, there were two distinct glass‐transition temperatures for a 50/50 NR/NBR blend, indicating the strongly incompatible nature of the blend. When the TOR level was increased, the glass transition of NBR was strongly suppressed. NBR droplets of a few micrometers were uniformly dispersed in the continuous NR phases in the NR/NBR blends. When TOR was added to a 50/50 NR/NBR blend, TOR tended to be located in the NR phase and in some cases was positioned at the interfaces between the NBR and NR phases. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 125–134, 2002
OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract The influence of trans‐polyoctylene rubber (TOR) on the mechanical properties, glass‐transition behavior, and phase morphology of natural rubber (NR)/acrylonitrile–butadiene rubber (NBR) blends was investigated. With an increased TOR level, hardness, tensile modulus, and resilience increased, whereas tensile strength and elongation at break tremendously decreased. According to differential scanning calorimetry and dynamic mechanical analysis, there were two distinct glass‐transition temperatures for a 50/50 NR/NBR blend, indicating the strongly incompatible nature of the blend. When the TOR level was increased, the glass transition of NBR was strongly suppressed. NBR droplets of a few micrometers were uniformly dispersed in the continuous NR phases in the NR/NBR blends. When TOR was added to a 50/50 NR/NBR blend, TOR tended to be located in the NR phase and in some cases was positioned at the interfaces between the NBR and NR phases. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 125–134, 2002
Key concepts: Natural rubber, Glass transition, Materials science, Acrylonitrile, Differential scanning calorimetry, Composite material, Ultimate tensile strength, Polymer blend