2006•Foodborne Pathogens and DiseaseRequires access

A Comparison of Listeria monocytogenes Serovar 4b Isolates of Clinical and Food Origin in Austria by Automated Ribotyping and Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis

Katharina Grif, Ingrid Heller, Martin Wagner, Manfred Paul Dierich, Reinhard Würzner

Open publisher page 17 citations

Abstract

In this study, two typing methods, automated ribotyping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), were evaluated for the subtyping of Listeria monocytogenes serotype 4b. The strains originated from patients and food samples collected in Austria during 2001-2005 and from Europe and North America in the World Health Organization collaborative study on the subtyping of this species. The largest group of Austrian clinical isolates was of the same PFGE subtype as those isolated from foodborne outbreaks in Switzerland and in the United States. Another subtype of clinical isolates from Austria was indistinguishable to that obtained from isolates responsible for a foodborne outbreak in the United States in 1985. Although the discriminatory power of PFGE was higher than that of automated ribotyping, some PFGE types were differentiated by ribotyping. Thus, combining data obtained by both automated ribotyping and PFGE increases the strain discrimination. Still, many of the Austrian strains remain indistinguishable from strains of foodborne outbreaks in other countries although there is no known epidemiological relation. This complies to previous studies which show the highly clonal nature of L. monocytogenes 4b strains which are responsible for both large outbreaks and sporadic cases.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this study, two typing methods, automated ribotyping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), were evaluated for the subtyping of Listeria monocytogenes serotype 4b. The strains originated from patients and food samples collected in Austria during 2001-2005 and from Europe and North America in the World Health Organization collaborative study on the subtyping of this species. The largest group of Austrian clinical isolates was of the same PFGE subtype as those isolated from foodborne outbreaks in Switzerland and in the United States. Another subtype of clinical isolates from Austria was indistinguishable to that obtained from isolates responsible for a foodborne outbreak in the United States in 1985. Although the discriminatory power of PFGE was higher than that of automated ribotyping, some PFGE types were differentiated by ribotyping. Thus, combining data obtained by both automated ribotyping and PFGE increases the strain discrimination. Still, many of the Austrian strains remain indistinguishable from strains of foodborne outbreaks in other countries although there is no known epidemiological relation. This complies to previous studies which show the highly clonal nature of L. monocytogenes 4b strains which are responsible for both large outbreaks and sporadic cases.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this study, two typing methods, automated ribotyping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), were evaluated for the subtyping of Listeria monocytogenes serotype 4b. The strains originated from patients and food samples collected in Austria during 2001-2005 and from Europe and North America in the World Health Organization collaborative study on the subtyping of this species. The largest group of Austrian clinical isolates was of the same PFGE subtype as those isolated from foodborne outbreaks in Switzerland and in the United States. Another subtype of clinical isolates from Austria was indistinguishable to that obtained from isolates responsible for a foodborne outbreak in the United States in 1985. Although the discriminatory power of PFGE was higher than that of automated ribotyping, some PFGE types were differentiated by ribotyping. Thus, combining data obtained by both automated ribotyping and PFGE increases the strain discrimination. Still, many of the Austrian strains remain indistinguishable from strains of foodborne outbreaks in other countries although there is no known epidemiological relation. This complies to previous studies which show the highly clonal nature of L. monocytogenes 4b strains which are responsible for both large outbreaks and sporadic cases.

Key concepts: Ribotyping, Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, Subtyping, Serotype, Listeria monocytogenes, Outbreak, Microbiology, Typing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparison of Listeria monocytogenes Serovar 4b Isolates of Clinical and Food Origin in Austria by Automated Ribotyping and Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis — Research Paper | ScholarLens