2004Journal of Applied Polymer ScienceRequires access

Blends of polymers with similar glass transition temperatures: A DMTA and DSC study

Dimitrios Ν. Bikiaris, J. Prinos, M. Botev, C. Betchev, Costas Panayiotou

Open publisher page 83 citations

Abstract

Abstract The miscibility of different polymer blends was studied with dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA) in conjunction with differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The blends were prepared by melt mixing polymers having similar glass transitions such as polyglutarimide (PGI), styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride random copolymers (SMA), and polystyrene (PS). In PGI/SMA blends, there is only one glass transition detected with DMTA. In the case of PGI/SMA14 blends, the single glass transition temperature is due to their full miscibility. However, PGI/SMA8 blends are immiscible throughout the whole composition range as was verified by optical observation (opaque appearance), DSC, and scanning electron microscopy. The observation of only one glass transition by DMTA was attributed to weak interactions that take place between the two polymers, leading to partial mutual solubility and bringing the slightly different Tg temperatures of the pure polymers even closer. In SMA8/SMA14 blends, there are two glass transitions detected with DSC as well as with DMTA, indicating that the two copolymers are immiscible. However, in all compositions, shifts of the glass transitions were observed with DMTA, which is evidence of partial miscibility. The observation of immiscibility was easiest in PS/SMA blends by both techniques, because of the bigger difference in glass transition temperatures of the initial polymers. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 93: 726–735, 2004

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The miscibility of different polymer blends was studied with dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA) in conjunction with differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The blends were prepared by melt mixing polymers having similar glass transitions such as polyglutarimide (PGI), styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride random copolymers (SMA), and polystyrene (PS). In PGI/SMA blends, there is only one glass transition detected with DMTA. In the case of PGI/SMA14 blends, the single glass transition temperature is due to their full miscibility. However, PGI/SMA8 blends are immiscible throughout the whole composition range as was verified by optical observation (opaque appearance), DSC, and scanning electron microscopy. The observation of only one glass transition by DMTA was attributed to weak interactions that take place between the two polymers, leading to partial mutual solubility and bringing the slightly different Tg temperatures of the pure polymers even closer. In SMA8/SMA14 blends, there are two glass transitions detected with DSC as well as with DMTA, indicating that the two copolymers are immiscible. However, in all compositions, shifts of the glass transitions were observed with DMTA, which is evidence of partial miscibility. The observation of immiscibility was easiest in PS/SMA blends by both techniques, because of the bigger difference in glass transition temperatures of the initial polymers. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 93: 726–735, 2004

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 83 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The miscibility of different polymer blends was studied with dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA) in conjunction with differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The blends were prepared by melt mixing polymers having similar glass transitions such as polyglutarimide (PGI), styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride random copolymers (SMA), and polystyrene (PS). In PGI/SMA blends, there is only one glass transition detected with DMTA. In the case of PGI/SMA14 blends, the single glass transition temperature is due to their full miscibility. However, PGI/SMA8 blends are immiscible throughout the whole composition range as was verified by optical observation (opaque appearance), DSC, and scanning electron microscopy. The observation of only one glass transition by DMTA was attributed to weak interactions that take place between the two polymers, leading to partial mutual solubility and bringing the slightly different Tg temperatures of the pure polymers even closer. In SMA8/SMA14 blends, there are two glass transitions detected with DSC as well as with DMTA, indicating that the two copolymers are immiscible. However, in all compositions, shifts of the glass transitions were observed with DMTA, which is evidence of partial miscibility. The observation of immiscibility was easiest in PS/SMA blends by both techniques, because of the bigger difference in glass transition temperatures of the initial polymers. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 93: 726–735, 2004

Key concepts: Dynamic mechanical analysis, Miscibility, Glass transition, Materials science, Differential scanning calorimetry, Polymer blend, Polymer, Copolymer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Blends of polymers with similar glass transition temperatures: A DMTA and DSC study — Research Paper | ScholarLens