1976The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaRequires access

Selective attention and simple auditory recognition: Methodological considerations

William A. Ahroon

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

We have reported at recent meetings a severe performance decrement in two-channel frequency difference limen tasks. In these studies, d's in both the selective attention and divided attention conditions were significantly depressed relative to monaural levels. When the signals to the two earphone channels were widely separated in frequency (by nine to ten critical bands), the selective attention condition was improved relative to the divided attention condition, yet still significantly below monaural performance levels. When all signals were within the same critical band (or were separated by only two or three critical bands), there were no significant differences between the two dichotic conditions. The present study generated psychometric functions under the selective and divided attention conditions for signals within the same critical band. Using this procedure, differences between the two dichotic listening conditions are evident in both absolute performance levels and in the psychometric functions. The results of the present experiment clearly indicate the need for greater use of adaptive psychophysical methods in the study of dual channel listening. [Research supported by grant NS 10995 from N.I.N.D.S.]

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We have reported at recent meetings a severe performance decrement in two-channel frequency difference limen tasks. In these studies, d's in both the selective attention and divided attention conditions were significantly depressed relative to monaural levels. When the signals to the two earphone channels were widely separated in frequency (by nine to ten critical bands), the selective attention condition was improved relative to the divided attention condition, yet still significantly below monaural performance levels. When all signals were within the same critical band (or were separated by only two or three critical bands), there were no significant differences between the two dichotic conditions. The present study generated psychometric functions under the selective and divided attention conditions for signals within the same critical band. Using this procedure, differences between the two dichotic listening conditions are evident in both absolute performance levels and in the psychometric functions. The results of the present experiment clearly indicate the need for greater use of adaptive psychophysical methods in the study of dual channel listening. [Research supported by grant NS 10995 from N.I.N.D.S.]

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We have reported at recent meetings a severe performance decrement in two-channel frequency difference limen tasks. In these studies, d's in both the selective attention and divided attention conditions were significantly depressed relative to monaural levels. When the signals to the two earphone channels were widely separated in frequency (by nine to ten critical bands), the selective attention condition was improved relative to the divided attention condition, yet still significantly below monaural performance levels. When all signals were within the same critical band (or were separated by only two or three critical bands), there were no significant differences between the two dichotic conditions. The present study generated psychometric functions under the selective and divided attention conditions for signals within the same critical band. Using this procedure, differences between the two dichotic listening conditions are evident in both absolute performance levels and in the psychometric functions. The results of the present experiment clearly indicate the need for greater use of adaptive psychophysical methods in the study of dual channel listening. [Research supported by grant NS 10995 from N.I.N.D.S.]

Key concepts: Dichotic listening, Monaural, Critical band, Audiology, Selective attention, Selective auditory attention, Active listening, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Selective attention and simple auditory recognition: Methodological considerations — Research Paper | ScholarLens