2004Qualitative Research in PsychologyRequires access

‘I don't have no damn cultures’: doing ‘normality’ in a ‘deviant’ setting

Karin Osvaldsson

Open publisher page 39 citations

Abstract

This paper extends earlier interview-based work on youth in institutions, which is seldom grounded in actual analysis of the interaction taking place in the parties to the interview. In line with work within discursive psychology (DP) as well as ethnomethodology (EM), it fleshes out the interactional means through which both parties concertedly produce and interpret locally sensitive formulations, descriptions and accounts. The data consists of ten interviews with female residents in Swedish Youth Detention Homes specialized in assessments and/or treatment. Broadly, the study shows how various notions of ‘normality’ are locally constructed and exploited to account for presumably deviant behavior, typically by relocating the notion of device from the subject herself to the social circumstances. Finally, direct claims of being normal served to build up explicit opposition toward previous institutional categorizations of the teenager. This research emphasises the need for researchers to attend to such interactional phenomena as joint categorization of persons, construction of events and production of accounts, as well as the locally relevant rationalities underlying these discursive constructions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper extends earlier interview-based work on youth in institutions, which is seldom grounded in actual analysis of the interaction taking place in the parties to the interview. In line with work within discursive psychology (DP) as well as ethnomethodology (EM), it fleshes out the interactional means through which both parties concertedly produce and interpret locally sensitive formulations, descriptions and accounts. The data consists of ten interviews with female residents in Swedish Youth Detention Homes specialized in assessments and/or treatment. Broadly, the study shows how various notions of ‘normality’ are locally constructed and exploited to account for presumably deviant behavior, typically by relocating the notion of device from the subject herself to the social circumstances. Finally, direct claims of being normal served to build up explicit opposition toward previous institutional categorizations of the teenager. This research emphasises the need for researchers to attend to such interactional phenomena as joint categorization of persons, construction of events and production of accounts, as well as the locally relevant rationalities underlying these discursive constructions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 39 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper extends earlier interview-based work on youth in institutions, which is seldom grounded in actual analysis of the interaction taking place in the parties to the interview. In line with work within discursive psychology (DP) as well as ethnomethodology (EM), it fleshes out the interactional means through which both parties concertedly produce and interpret locally sensitive formulations, descriptions and accounts. The data consists of ten interviews with female residents in Swedish Youth Detention Homes specialized in assessments and/or treatment. Broadly, the study shows how various notions of ‘normality’ are locally constructed and exploited to account for presumably deviant behavior, typically by relocating the notion of device from the subject herself to the social circumstances. Finally, direct claims of being normal served to build up explicit opposition toward previous institutional categorizations of the teenager. This research emphasises the need for researchers to attend to such interactional phenomena as joint categorization of persons, construction of events and production of accounts, as well as the locally relevant rationalities underlying these discursive constructions.

Key concepts: Normality, Ethnomethodology, Discursive psychology, Sociology, Opposition (politics), Conversation analysis, Categorization, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
‘I don't have no damn cultures’: doing ‘normality’ in a ‘deviant’ setting — Research Paper | ScholarLens