1989Pesticide ScienceRequires access

A comparison of permethrin and methomyl insecticides for the control of a multiresistant strain of houseflies (Musca domestica)

D. P. Webb, K. B. Wildey, Paul Chapman

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Abstract A methomyl sugar bait formulation and permethrin residual spray were compared for the control of a multi‐insecticide resistant strain of housefly in a UK pig farm. The methomyl was applied as a granular scatter bait at the manufacturer's recommended rate of 25 mg m−2 active ingredient (a.i.) to the treated floor area. Permethrin was applied at 32, 64 and 128 mg m−2 a.i. to structural surfaces. The highest deposit rate of permethrin used was four times that recommended by the manufacturer for the control of flying insects. The methomyl bait gave effective control but the permethrin spray failed at all deposit rates tested. The use of permethrin increased resistance to this compound at the KD50 level from x 13 to x 560 within 10 weeks and significantly increased the proportion of flies resistant to natural pyrethrins synergised with piperonyl butoxide (P<0.01).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract A methomyl sugar bait formulation and permethrin residual spray were compared for the control of a multi‐insecticide resistant strain of housefly in a UK pig farm. The methomyl was applied as a granular scatter bait at the manufacturer's recommended rate of 25 mg m−2 active ingredient (a.i.) to the treated floor area. Permethrin was applied at 32, 64 and 128 mg m−2 a.i. to structural surfaces. The highest deposit rate of permethrin used was four times that recommended by the manufacturer for the control of flying insects. The methomyl bait gave effective control but the permethrin spray failed at all deposit rates tested. The use of permethrin increased resistance to this compound at the KD50 level from x 13 to x 560 within 10 weeks and significantly increased the proportion of flies resistant to natural pyrethrins synergised with piperonyl butoxide (P<0.01).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract A methomyl sugar bait formulation and permethrin residual spray were compared for the control of a multi‐insecticide resistant strain of housefly in a UK pig farm. The methomyl was applied as a granular scatter bait at the manufacturer's recommended rate of 25 mg m−2 active ingredient (a.i.) to the treated floor area. Permethrin was applied at 32, 64 and 128 mg m−2 a.i. to structural surfaces. The highest deposit rate of permethrin used was four times that recommended by the manufacturer for the control of flying insects. The methomyl bait gave effective control but the permethrin spray failed at all deposit rates tested. The use of permethrin increased resistance to this compound at the KD50 level from x 13 to x 560 within 10 weeks and significantly increased the proportion of flies resistant to natural pyrethrins synergised with piperonyl butoxide (P<0.01).

Key concepts: Permethrin, Methomyl, Piperonyl butoxide, Housefly, Toxicology, Pyrethroid, Biology, Pesticide

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparison of permethrin and methomyl insecticides for the control of a multiresistant strain of houseflies (Musca domestica) — Research Paper | ScholarLens