1991Journal Of Consumer Studies and Home EconomicsRequires access

Home economics programmes in Oyo state secondary schools: a survey

Elizabeth Aina Owolabi, Linda Peterat, Margaret Arcus

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the curricula emphases in home economics in Oyo state secondary schools and to describe selected aspects of teaching and the teacher. Sixty‐two home economics teachers in Oyo state responded to a mailed survey indicating the degree of emphasis given to 50 topics in five subject‐matter areas of home economics: (i) clothing and textiles, (ii) foods and nutrition, (iii) home management and family economics, (iv) housing, and (v) human development and the family. The most taught subject‐matter areas (in order) are foods and nutrition, home management and family economics and clothing and textiles while human development and the family and housing were the least taught subject‐matter areas. A similar response was given for teacher's reported level of competence and subject‐matter preference. Scores on the topics within each subject‐matter area, however, indicated that all the five subject‐matter areas were moderately emphasized in the curriculum. These three philosophical views of home economics exist concurrently in Oyo state secondary schools: (i) home economics as home‐making education, (ii) home economics as household management, and (iii) home economics as cooking and sewing. Suggestions for improving and strengthening the current home economics programmes are discussed. This research was conducted during 1987–1988 in the Faculty of Education, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this study was to identify the curricula emphases in home economics in Oyo state secondary schools and to describe selected aspects of teaching and the teacher. Sixty‐two home economics teachers in Oyo state responded to a mailed survey indicating the degree of emphasis given to 50 topics in five subject‐matter areas of home economics: (i) clothing and textiles, (ii) foods and nutrition, (iii) home management and family economics, (iv) housing, and (v) human development and the family. The most taught subject‐matter areas (in order) are foods and nutrition, home management and family economics and clothing and textiles while human development and the family and housing were the least taught subject‐matter areas. A similar response was given for teacher's reported level of competence and subject‐matter preference. Scores on the topics within each subject‐matter area, however, indicated that all the five subject‐matter areas were moderately emphasized in the curriculum. These three philosophical views of home economics exist concurrently in Oyo state secondary schools: (i) home economics as home‐making education, (ii) home economics as household management, and (iii) home economics as cooking and sewing. Suggestions for improving and strengthening the current home economics programmes are discussed. This research was conducted during 1987–1988 in the Faculty of Education, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the curricula emphases in home economics in Oyo state secondary schools and to describe selected aspects of teaching and the teacher. Sixty‐two home economics teachers in Oyo state responded to a mailed survey indicating the degree of emphasis given to 50 topics in five subject‐matter areas of home economics: (i) clothing and textiles, (ii) foods and nutrition, (iii) home management and family economics, (iv) housing, and (v) human development and the family. The most taught subject‐matter areas (in order) are foods and nutrition, home management and family economics and clothing and textiles while human development and the family and housing were the least taught subject‐matter areas. A similar response was given for teacher's reported level of competence and subject‐matter preference. Scores on the topics within each subject‐matter area, however, indicated that all the five subject‐matter areas were moderately emphasized in the curriculum. These three philosophical views of home economics exist concurrently in Oyo state secondary schools: (i) home economics as home‐making education, (ii) home economics as household management, and (iii) home economics as cooking and sewing. Suggestions for improving and strengthening the current home economics programmes are discussed. This research was conducted during 1987–1988 in the Faculty of Education, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Key concepts: Family and consumer science, Subject matter, Economics education, Curriculum, Clothing, Subject (documents), Competence (human resources), Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Home economics programmes in Oyo state secondary schools: a survey — Research Paper | ScholarLens