2013•StrokeOpen access

Timeliness of Intravenous Thrombolysis via Telestroke in Georgia

Askiel Bruno, Katherine M. Lanning, Hartmut Gross, David Charles Hess, Fenwick T. Nichols, Jeffrey Alan Switzer

Open full text 18 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Through 2-way live video and audio communication, telestroke enhances urgent treatment of patients with acute stroke in emergency departments (EDs) without immediate access to on-site specialists. To assess for opportunities to shorten the door to thrombolysis time, we measured multiple time intervals in a telestroke system. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 115 records of consecutive acute stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis during a 20-month period via a statewide telestroke system in 17 EDs in Georgia. On the basis of times documented in the telestroke system, we calculated the time elapsed between the following events: ED arrival, telestroke patient registration, start of specialist consultation, head computed tomography, thrombolysis recommendation, and thrombolysis initiation. RESULTS: The most conspicuous delay was from ED arrival to telestroke patient registration (median, 39 minutes; interquartile range, 21-56). Median time from ED arrival to thrombolysis initiation was 88 minutes, interquartile range 75 to 105. Thrombolysis was initiated within 60 minutes from ED arrival in 13% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The greatest opportunity to expedite acute thrombolysis via telestroke is by shortening the time from ED arrival to telestroke patient registration.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Through 2-way live video and audio communication, telestroke enhances urgent treatment of patients with acute stroke in emergency departments (EDs) without immediate access to on-site specialists. To assess for opportunities to shorten the door to thrombolysis time, we measured multiple time intervals in a telestroke system. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 115 records of consecutive acute stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis during a 20-month period via a statewide telestroke system in 17 EDs in Georgia. On the basis of times documented in the telestroke system, we calculated the time elapsed between the following events: ED arrival, telestroke patient registration, start of specialist consultation, head computed tomography, thrombolysis recommendation, and thrombolysis initiation. RESULTS: The most conspicuous delay was from ED arrival to telestroke patient registration (median, 39 minutes; interquartile range, 21-56). Median time from ED arrival to thrombolysis initiation was 88 minutes, interquartile range 75 to 105. Thrombolysis was initiated within 60 minutes from ED arrival in 13% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The greatest opportunity to expedite acute thrombolysis via telestroke is by shortening the time from ED arrival to telestroke patient registration.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Through 2-way live video and audio communication, telestroke enhances urgent treatment of patients with acute stroke in emergency departments (EDs) without immediate access to on-site specialists. To assess for opportunities to shorten the door to thrombolysis time, we measured multiple time intervals in a telestroke system. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 115 records of consecutive acute stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis during a 20-month period via a statewide telestroke system in 17 EDs in Georgia. On the basis of times documented in the telestroke system, we calculated the time elapsed between the following events: ED arrival, telestroke patient registration, start of specialist consultation, head computed tomography, thrombolysis recommendation, and thrombolysis initiation. RESULTS: The most conspicuous delay was from ED arrival to telestroke patient registration (median, 39 minutes; interquartile range, 21-56). Median time from ED arrival to thrombolysis initiation was 88 minutes, interquartile range 75 to 105. Thrombolysis was initiated within 60 minutes from ED arrival in 13% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The greatest opportunity to expedite acute thrombolysis via telestroke is by shortening the time from ED arrival to telestroke patient registration.

Key concepts: Medicine, Thrombolysis, Stroke (engine), Emergency medicine, Acute stroke, Anesthesia, Medical emergency, Intensive care medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Timeliness of Intravenous Thrombolysis via Telestroke in Georgia — Research Paper | ScholarLens