1987•Library Hi TechRequires access

Responding to an RFP: A Vendor's Viewpoint

Robert A. Kington

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A typical vendor of library automation systems cannot, and most likely will not want to, respond to all requests for proposals (RFPs) that it receives. Certain “elimination factors” contribute to the decision to bid or not bid. These include: 1) specifications for the use of computer equipment not employed by the vendor; 2) required features not provided by the vendor's software; 3) performance requirements not met or performed differently by the vendor; 4) a “wired” RFP based on a competitor's system; 5) the size and complexity of the RFP itself; and 6) competition for a vendor's time, such as posed by numerous other previously‐received RFPs that must be answered.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A typical vendor of library automation systems cannot, and most likely will not want to, respond to all requests for proposals (RFPs) that it receives. Certain “elimination factors” contribute to the decision to bid or not bid. These include: 1) specifications for the use of computer equipment not employed by the vendor; 2) required features not provided by the vendor's software; 3) performance requirements not met or performed differently by the vendor; 4) a “wired” RFP based on a competitor's system; 5) the size and complexity of the RFP itself; and 6) competition for a vendor's time, such as posed by numerous other previously‐received RFPs that must be answered.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A typical vendor of library automation systems cannot, and most likely will not want to, respond to all requests for proposals (RFPs) that it receives. Certain “elimination factors” contribute to the decision to bid or not bid. These include: 1) specifications for the use of computer equipment not employed by the vendor; 2) required features not provided by the vendor's software; 3) performance requirements not met or performed differently by the vendor; 4) a “wired” RFP based on a competitor's system; 5) the size and complexity of the RFP itself; and 6) competition for a vendor's time, such as posed by numerous other previously‐received RFPs that must be answered.

Key concepts: Vendor, Request for proposal, Computer science, Automation, Software, Competition (biology), Operating system, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Responding to an RFP: A Vendor's Viewpoint — Research Paper | ScholarLens