2014•Prosthetics and Orthotics InternationalRequires access

Dutch evidence-based guidelines for amputation and prosthetics of the lower extremity

Jan H. B. Geertzen, Harmen van der Linde, Kitty Rosenbrand, Marcel Conradi, Jos Deckers, Jan de Koning, Hans S. Rietman, Dick van der Schaaf, Rein van der Ploeg, Johannes W.L.C. Schapendonk, Ernst Schrier, Rob Smit Duijzentkunst, Monica Spruit‐van Eijk, Gerbrig J. Versteegen, H. G. J. Voesten

Open publisher page 38 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgeons still use a range of criteria to determine whether amputation is indicated. In addition, there is considerable debate regarding immediate postoperative management, especially concerning the use of 'immediate/delayed fitting' versus conservative elastic bandaging. OBJECTIVES: To produce an evidence-based guideline for the amputation and prosthetics of the lower extremities. This guideline provides recommendations in support of daily practice and is based on the results of scientific research and further discussions focussed on establishing good medical practice. Part 1 focuses on amputation surgery and postoperative management. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic literature design. METHODS: Literature search in five databases. Quality assessment on the basis of evidence-based guideline development. RESULTS: An evidence-based multidisciplinary guideline on amputation and prosthetics of the lower extremity. CONCLUSION: The best care (in general) for patients undergoing amputation of a lower extremity is presented and discussed. This part of the guideline provides recommendations for diagnosis, referral, assessment, and undergoing amputation of a lower extremity and can be used to provide patient information. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This guideline provides recommendations in support of daily practice and is based on the results of scientific research and further discussions focussed on establishing good medical practice.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Surgeons still use a range of criteria to determine whether amputation is indicated. In addition, there is considerable debate regarding immediate postoperative management, especially concerning the use of 'immediate/delayed fitting' versus conservative elastic bandaging. OBJECTIVES: To produce an evidence-based guideline for the amputation and prosthetics of the lower extremities. This guideline provides recommendations in support of daily practice and is based on the results of scientific research and further discussions focussed on establishing good medical practice. Part 1 focuses on amputation surgery and postoperative management. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic literature design. METHODS: Literature search in five databases. Quality assessment on the basis of evidence-based guideline development. RESULTS: An evidence-based multidisciplinary guideline on amputation and prosthetics of the lower extremity. CONCLUSION: The best care (in general) for patients undergoing amputation of a lower extremity is presented and discussed. This part of the guideline provides recommendations for diagnosis, referral, assessment, and undergoing amputation of a lower extremity and can be used to provide patient information. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This guideline provides recommendations in support of daily practice and is based on the results of scientific research and further discussions focussed on establishing good medical practice.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 38 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgeons still use a range of criteria to determine whether amputation is indicated. In addition, there is considerable debate regarding immediate postoperative management, especially concerning the use of 'immediate/delayed fitting' versus conservative elastic bandaging. OBJECTIVES: To produce an evidence-based guideline for the amputation and prosthetics of the lower extremities. This guideline provides recommendations in support of daily practice and is based on the results of scientific research and further discussions focussed on establishing good medical practice. Part 1 focuses on amputation surgery and postoperative management. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic literature design. METHODS: Literature search in five databases. Quality assessment on the basis of evidence-based guideline development. RESULTS: An evidence-based multidisciplinary guideline on amputation and prosthetics of the lower extremity. CONCLUSION: The best care (in general) for patients undergoing amputation of a lower extremity is presented and discussed. This part of the guideline provides recommendations for diagnosis, referral, assessment, and undergoing amputation of a lower extremity and can be used to provide patient information. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This guideline provides recommendations in support of daily practice and is based on the results of scientific research and further discussions focussed on establishing good medical practice.

Key concepts: Guideline, Amputation, Medicine, Rehabilitation, Evidence-based medicine, Multidisciplinary approach, Referral, Physical therapy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Dutch evidence-based guidelines for amputation and prosthetics of the lower extremity — Research Paper | ScholarLens