2014•OphthalmologicaRequires access

Switch from Intravitreal Ranibizumab to Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Clinical Comparison

João Pinheiro-Costa, Paulo Freitas‐da‐Costa, Manuel S. Falcão, Elisete Brandão, Fernando Falcão‐Reis, Ângela M. Carneiro

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes after switching from intravitreal ranibizumab to bevacizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: A retrospective review of 110 eyes treated in a 1+PRN (pro re nata) clinical setting with ranibizumab that were switched to bevacizumab. Patients analyzed had at least 3 ranibizumab injections followed by at least 3 bevacizumab injections. Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), retinal thickness and frequency of injections were compared. RESULTS: The mean duration of ranibizumab treatment was 18.1 months, followed by 12.2 months of bevacizumab. Mean injection rates per month were similar (0.54 and 0.56 respectively, p = 0.230). There were no significant differences between BCVA at baseline and at the time of the switch (52.4 and 54.8 letters, p = 0.059). After the switch, there was a statistically significant decrease in BCVA to 51.7 letters (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Switching patients to bevacizumab may have a minor negative effect on the initial gain obtained with ranibizumab; however the degenerative history of wet AMD could explain this small variation in visual acuity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes after switching from intravitreal ranibizumab to bevacizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: A retrospective review of 110 eyes treated in a 1+PRN (pro re nata) clinical setting with ranibizumab that were switched to bevacizumab. Patients analyzed had at least 3 ranibizumab injections followed by at least 3 bevacizumab injections. Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), retinal thickness and frequency of injections were compared. RESULTS: The mean duration of ranibizumab treatment was 18.1 months, followed by 12.2 months of bevacizumab. Mean injection rates per month were similar (0.54 and 0.56 respectively, p = 0.230). There were no significant differences between BCVA at baseline and at the time of the switch (52.4 and 54.8 letters, p = 0.059). After the switch, there was a statistically significant decrease in BCVA to 51.7 letters (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Switching patients to bevacizumab may have a minor negative effect on the initial gain obtained with ranibizumab; however the degenerative history of wet AMD could explain this small variation in visual acuity.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes after switching from intravitreal ranibizumab to bevacizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: A retrospective review of 110 eyes treated in a 1+PRN (pro re nata) clinical setting with ranibizumab that were switched to bevacizumab. Patients analyzed had at least 3 ranibizumab injections followed by at least 3 bevacizumab injections. Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), retinal thickness and frequency of injections were compared. RESULTS: The mean duration of ranibizumab treatment was 18.1 months, followed by 12.2 months of bevacizumab. Mean injection rates per month were similar (0.54 and 0.56 respectively, p = 0.230). There were no significant differences between BCVA at baseline and at the time of the switch (52.4 and 54.8 letters, p = 0.059). After the switch, there was a statistically significant decrease in BCVA to 51.7 letters (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Switching patients to bevacizumab may have a minor negative effect on the initial gain obtained with ranibizumab; however the degenerative history of wet AMD could explain this small variation in visual acuity.

Key concepts: Ranibizumab, Medicine, Bevacizumab, Macular degeneration, Ophthalmology, Pro re nata, Visual acuity, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Switch from Intravitreal Ranibizumab to Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Clinical Comparison — Research Paper | ScholarLens