1981•Grass and Forage ScienceRequires access

Silage and milk production: a comparison between long, chopped and ground hays as supplements to silage of high digestibility

M. E. Castle, M. Gill, J. N. Watson

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Grass silage made in May from S24 perennial ryegrass had a DM concentration of 262 g kg‐1 and an in vitro D‐value of 0·698, and was given ad libitum to twelve Ayrshire cows in a 16‐week feeding experiment. In addition supplements of hay with a mean in vitro D‐value of 0·603 were offered in one of three forms—long, chopped (12·1 mm) or ground (0·80 modulus of fineness) and cubed—and of concentrates given at either 2 or 4 kg per 10 kg milk. Hay averaged 18·2% of total forage DM intake with mean daily intakes of 1·28, 1·22 and 2·26 kg DM per cow in the long, short and ground forms respectively. The highest daily intakes of forage, i.e. silage plus hay, occurred on the ground hay treatments, with values of 10·24 and 9·25 kg DM per cow on the 2 and 4 kg concentrate treatments respectively. The mean daily milk yields were 18·2,18·2 and 19·2 kg per cow on the long, short and ground hay treatments respectively but the increase in yield with the ground hay was only significant at the low level of concentrate intake. The hay treatments had small and non‐significant effects on milk composition. It is concluded that ground hay was superior to either long or chopped hay as a supplement for silage, but the small advantages depended on the level of concentrate intake.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Grass silage made in May from S24 perennial ryegrass had a DM concentration of 262 g kg‐1 and an in vitro D‐value of 0·698, and was given ad libitum to twelve Ayrshire cows in a 16‐week feeding experiment. In addition supplements of hay with a mean in vitro D‐value of 0·603 were offered in one of three forms—long, chopped (12·1 mm) or ground (0·80 modulus of fineness) and cubed—and of concentrates given at either 2 or 4 kg per 10 kg milk. Hay averaged 18·2% of total forage DM intake with mean daily intakes of 1·28, 1·22 and 2·26 kg DM per cow in the long, short and ground forms respectively. The highest daily intakes of forage, i.e. silage plus hay, occurred on the ground hay treatments, with values of 10·24 and 9·25 kg DM per cow on the 2 and 4 kg concentrate treatments respectively. The mean daily milk yields were 18·2,18·2 and 19·2 kg per cow on the long, short and ground hay treatments respectively but the increase in yield with the ground hay was only significant at the low level of concentrate intake. The hay treatments had small and non‐significant effects on milk composition. It is concluded that ground hay was superior to either long or chopped hay as a supplement for silage, but the small advantages depended on the level of concentrate intake.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Grass silage made in May from S24 perennial ryegrass had a DM concentration of 262 g kg‐1 and an in vitro D‐value of 0·698, and was given ad libitum to twelve Ayrshire cows in a 16‐week feeding experiment. In addition supplements of hay with a mean in vitro D‐value of 0·603 were offered in one of three forms—long, chopped (12·1 mm) or ground (0·80 modulus of fineness) and cubed—and of concentrates given at either 2 or 4 kg per 10 kg milk. Hay averaged 18·2% of total forage DM intake with mean daily intakes of 1·28, 1·22 and 2·26 kg DM per cow in the long, short and ground forms respectively. The highest daily intakes of forage, i.e. silage plus hay, occurred on the ground hay treatments, with values of 10·24 and 9·25 kg DM per cow on the 2 and 4 kg concentrate treatments respectively. The mean daily milk yields were 18·2,18·2 and 19·2 kg per cow on the long, short and ground hay treatments respectively but the increase in yield with the ground hay was only significant at the low level of concentrate intake. The hay treatments had small and non‐significant effects on milk composition. It is concluded that ground hay was superior to either long or chopped hay as a supplement for silage, but the small advantages depended on the level of concentrate intake.

Key concepts: Hay, Silage, Forage, Animal science, Alfalfa hay, Agronomy, Biology, Rumen

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Silage and milk production: a comparison between long, chopped and ground hays as supplements to silage of high digestibility — Research Paper | ScholarLens