1979Psychological ReportsRequires access

Intelligence and Organization in Memory Scanning for Trigrams

Edward D. Smith, Paula Settle, Barbara A. Gawinski

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Subjects high (mean IQ 117) and moderate (mean IQ 104) in IQ scanned their memories for either sets of letters or trigrams. The trigrams were either (a) organized, i.e., the positive set items were either all straight or all curved letters, or (b) unorganized, i.e., there was no such pattern. Results showed no IQ-related differences in scanning for letters or trigrams, either organized or unorganized. Subjects in the organized condition responded faster to negative than positive set trigrams, indicating that subjects in this condition were using two separate and hierarchical comparison stages. The first comparison involved the spatial characteristics of the trigrams; if the probe was in the curved trigram category and the positive set items were in the straight trigram category, then a negative response was emitted. But if this comparison was positive, then a further comparison search was made to determine if that specific trigram was a member of the positive set. The results seem to be inconsistent with Sternberg's (1969) four-stage scanning model.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Subjects high (mean IQ 117) and moderate (mean IQ 104) in IQ scanned their memories for either sets of letters or trigrams. The trigrams were either (a) organized, i.e., the positive set items were either all straight or all curved letters, or (b) unorganized, i.e., there was no such pattern. Results showed no IQ-related differences in scanning for letters or trigrams, either organized or unorganized. Subjects in the organized condition responded faster to negative than positive set trigrams, indicating that subjects in this condition were using two separate and hierarchical comparison stages. The first comparison involved the spatial characteristics of the trigrams; if the probe was in the curved trigram category and the positive set items were in the straight trigram category, then a negative response was emitted. But if this comparison was positive, then a further comparison search was made to determine if that specific trigram was a member of the positive set. The results seem to be inconsistent with Sternberg's (1969) four-stage scanning model.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Subjects high (mean IQ 117) and moderate (mean IQ 104) in IQ scanned their memories for either sets of letters or trigrams. The trigrams were either (a) organized, i.e., the positive set items were either all straight or all curved letters, or (b) unorganized, i.e., there was no such pattern. Results showed no IQ-related differences in scanning for letters or trigrams, either organized or unorganized. Subjects in the organized condition responded faster to negative than positive set trigrams, indicating that subjects in this condition were using two separate and hierarchical comparison stages. The first comparison involved the spatial characteristics of the trigrams; if the probe was in the curved trigram category and the positive set items were in the straight trigram category, then a negative response was emitted. But if this comparison was positive, then a further comparison search was made to determine if that specific trigram was a member of the positive set. The results seem to be inconsistent with Sternberg's (1969) four-stage scanning model.

Key concepts: Trigram, Set (abstract data type), Psychology, Audiology, Communication, Mathematics, Speech recognition, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Intelligence and Organization in Memory Scanning for Trigrams — Research Paper | ScholarLens