Rotational Alignment of the Finger Nails in a Normal Population
Radhika Bansal, Michael Craigen
Abstract
Radhika Bansal, Michael Craigen
Abstract
We measured the alignment of the nails in the hands of 100 normal adults with the interphalangeal joints extended and the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints at 0 degrees and 90 degrees. All fingers were naturally supinated (i.e. rotated towards the thumb), the index and little being the most supinated. When examining individual hands in MCP joint extension, only 17% of hands had all nails parallel. With the MCP joints flexed, this improved to 56%. If the little finger was excluded, this improved to 78%. When comparing matching fingers from the two hands, 76% of little, 83% of ring, 77% of middle and 80% of index fingers matched. Thumbnails were assessed in extension and found to match the other side in 95% of individuals. This study identifies that examination of the injured hand alone with all joints extended is an unreliable method of assessing malrotation following fracture, especially in the little finger. Comparing matching fingers in the two hands is more reliable, but there is still substantial variation in approximately 20% of normal individuals.
OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We measured the alignment of the nails in the hands of 100 normal adults with the interphalangeal joints extended and the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints at 0 degrees and 90 degrees. All fingers were naturally supinated (i.e. rotated towards the thumb), the index and little being the most supinated. When examining individual hands in MCP joint extension, only 17% of hands had all nails parallel. With the MCP joints flexed, this improved to 56%. If the little finger was excluded, this improved to 78%. When comparing matching fingers from the two hands, 76% of little, 83% of ring, 77% of middle and 80% of index fingers matched. Thumbnails were assessed in extension and found to match the other side in 95% of individuals. This study identifies that examination of the injured hand alone with all joints extended is an unreliable method of assessing malrotation following fracture, especially in the little finger. Comparing matching fingers in the two hands is more reliable, but there is still substantial variation in approximately 20% of normal individuals.
Key concepts: Medicine, Normal population, Orthodontics, Population, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Environmental health