1993Journal of the Geological SocietyRequires access

Dinantian (Lower Carboniferous) biostratigraphy and chronostratigraphy in the British Isles

N. J. Riley

Open publisher page 122 citations

Abstract

Vaughan’s (1905) zonation of the Carboniferous Limestone in the Bristol district was a pioneer biostratigraphical study, which because of its meticulous execution can be reinterpreted in a modern context. The replacement of his scheme with a chronostratigraphical one by George et al. 1976 had a similar revolutionary affect on British Dinantian stratigraphy. However, it is now time to revise the British Dinantian stages so that they more closely correspond to biostratigraphical events. Dinantian biostratigraphy still requires considerable refinement, but it has now achieved a diversity of techniques and resolution far beyond that which was available at the time of these earlier proposals. It is the most pragmatic and closest approximation to widespread chronostratigraphical correlation available. This paper discusses these and related issues and presents a review and correlation of current biozonations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Vaughan’s (1905) zonation of the Carboniferous Limestone in the Bristol district was a pioneer biostratigraphical study, which because of its meticulous execution can be reinterpreted in a modern context. The replacement of his scheme with a chronostratigraphical one by George et al. 1976 had a similar revolutionary affect on British Dinantian stratigraphy. However, it is now time to revise the British Dinantian stages so that they more closely correspond to biostratigraphical events. Dinantian biostratigraphy still requires considerable refinement, but it has now achieved a diversity of techniques and resolution far beyond that which was available at the time of these earlier proposals. It is the most pragmatic and closest approximation to widespread chronostratigraphical correlation available. This paper discusses these and related issues and presents a review and correlation of current biozonations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 122 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Vaughan’s (1905) zonation of the Carboniferous Limestone in the Bristol district was a pioneer biostratigraphical study, which because of its meticulous execution can be reinterpreted in a modern context. The replacement of his scheme with a chronostratigraphical one by George et al. 1976 had a similar revolutionary affect on British Dinantian stratigraphy. However, it is now time to revise the British Dinantian stages so that they more closely correspond to biostratigraphical events. Dinantian biostratigraphy still requires considerable refinement, but it has now achieved a diversity of techniques and resolution far beyond that which was available at the time of these earlier proposals. It is the most pragmatic and closest approximation to widespread chronostratigraphical correlation available. This paper discusses these and related issues and presents a review and correlation of current biozonations.

Key concepts: Chronostratigraphy, Biostratigraphy, Carboniferous, Geology, Paleontology, Paleozoic, Lithostratigraphy, Sedimentary rock

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Dinantian (Lower Carboniferous) biostratigraphy and chronostratigraphy in the British Isles — Research Paper | ScholarLens