2009Foodborne Pathogens and DiseaseRequires access

Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles and Mechanisms of Resistance in Campylobacter jejuni Isolates from Pets

Els Acke, Kevina McGill, Teresa Quinn, Boyd R. Jones, Séamus Fanning, Paul Whyte

Open publisher page 18 citations

Abstract

The presence of antimicrobial resistance in 51 Campylobacter jejuni isolates obtained from cats and dogs was determined by E-testing. Resistance to nalidixic acid (37.3% of isolates), ciprofloxacin (19.6%), tetracycline (13.7%), ampicillin (13.7%), erythromycin (11.8%), and chloramphenicol (5.9%) was detected. Resistance to two antimicrobials or more was present in 31.4% of isolates, and one isolate was resistant to all six antimicrobials. Of the isolates with ciprofloxacin and/or nalidixic acid resistance, 54.5% had the gyrA substitution Thr-86-Ile on sequencing. The tet o gene was detected in 75.0% isolates with high-level resistance to tetracycline. With the observed antimicrobial resistance in C. jejuni isolates from pets in this study, and the detection of identical mechanisms for quinolone and tetracycline resistance in pets and humans, pets should be considered a potential source of (multi)resistant C. jejuni infections in humans.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The presence of antimicrobial resistance in 51 Campylobacter jejuni isolates obtained from cats and dogs was determined by E-testing. Resistance to nalidixic acid (37.3% of isolates), ciprofloxacin (19.6%), tetracycline (13.7%), ampicillin (13.7%), erythromycin (11.8%), and chloramphenicol (5.9%) was detected. Resistance to two antimicrobials or more was present in 31.4% of isolates, and one isolate was resistant to all six antimicrobials. Of the isolates with ciprofloxacin and/or nalidixic acid resistance, 54.5% had the gyrA substitution Thr-86-Ile on sequencing. The tet o gene was detected in 75.0% isolates with high-level resistance to tetracycline. With the observed antimicrobial resistance in C. jejuni isolates from pets in this study, and the detection of identical mechanisms for quinolone and tetracycline resistance in pets and humans, pets should be considered a potential source of (multi)resistant C. jejuni infections in humans.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The presence of antimicrobial resistance in 51 Campylobacter jejuni isolates obtained from cats and dogs was determined by E-testing. Resistance to nalidixic acid (37.3% of isolates), ciprofloxacin (19.6%), tetracycline (13.7%), ampicillin (13.7%), erythromycin (11.8%), and chloramphenicol (5.9%) was detected. Resistance to two antimicrobials or more was present in 31.4% of isolates, and one isolate was resistant to all six antimicrobials. Of the isolates with ciprofloxacin and/or nalidixic acid resistance, 54.5% had the gyrA substitution Thr-86-Ile on sequencing. The tet o gene was detected in 75.0% isolates with high-level resistance to tetracycline. With the observed antimicrobial resistance in C. jejuni isolates from pets in this study, and the detection of identical mechanisms for quinolone and tetracycline resistance in pets and humans, pets should be considered a potential source of (multi)resistant C. jejuni infections in humans.

Key concepts: Nalidixic acid, Tetracycline, Campylobacter jejuni, Microbiology, Ciprofloxacin, Antibiotic resistance, Antimicrobial, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles and Mechanisms of Resistance in Campylobacter jejuni Isolates from Pets — Research Paper | ScholarLens