2010IntervirologyRequires access

A Rapid Microscopic Method for the Confirmation of Rhinoviruses in Cell Culture

G Leonardi, Marie-Laure Desormeaux

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Culture-confirmation of rhinovirus is done using acid lability testing, a laborious and time-consuming method which delays the reporting of patient results by 1-2 days. A fluorescent monoclonal antibody pool (Light Diagnostics Pan-Enterovirus Blend; Millipore Inc., Temecula, Calif., USA) developed to identify various enterovirus isolates in culture was recently reported to also cross-react with rhinoviruses. We evaluated the use of this cross-reacting antibody, used in tandem with non-cross-reacting enterovirus antibodies (D(3) IFA; Diagnostic Hybrids Inc., Athens, Ohio, USA) to rapidly identify rhinoviruses in cell culture. METHODS: Microscope slides were prepared from cell cultures of 11 rhinovirus clinical isolates and a variety of other respiratory viruses. Slides were stained using both enterovirus antibody pools and examined for fluorescent activity. RESULTS: Positive fluorescence was observed in all the rhinovirus isolates tested using the pan-enterovirus antibody blend, but yielded negative results when stained using the D(3) antibodies. Both antibody products produced positive fluorescence for enterovirus isolates and produced negative results when a variety of other respiratory viruses were examined. CONCLUSION: Staining suspected rhinovirus isolates with each antibody pool affords a rapid means of identifying rhinoviruses and distinguishing them from enteroviruses, without the need for acid lability testing.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: Culture-confirmation of rhinovirus is done using acid lability testing, a laborious and time-consuming method which delays the reporting of patient results by 1-2 days. A fluorescent monoclonal antibody pool (Light Diagnostics Pan-Enterovirus Blend; Millipore Inc., Temecula, Calif., USA) developed to identify various enterovirus isolates in culture was recently reported to also cross-react with rhinoviruses. We evaluated the use of this cross-reacting antibody, used in tandem with non-cross-reacting enterovirus antibodies (D(3) IFA; Diagnostic Hybrids Inc., Athens, Ohio, USA) to rapidly identify rhinoviruses in cell culture. METHODS: Microscope slides were prepared from cell cultures of 11 rhinovirus clinical isolates and a variety of other respiratory viruses. Slides were stained using both enterovirus antibody pools and examined for fluorescent activity. RESULTS: Positive fluorescence was observed in all the rhinovirus isolates tested using the pan-enterovirus antibody blend, but yielded negative results when stained using the D(3) antibodies. Both antibody products produced positive fluorescence for enterovirus isolates and produced negative results when a variety of other respiratory viruses were examined. CONCLUSION: Staining suspected rhinovirus isolates with each antibody pool affords a rapid means of identifying rhinoviruses and distinguishing them from enteroviruses, without the need for acid lability testing.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: Culture-confirmation of rhinovirus is done using acid lability testing, a laborious and time-consuming method which delays the reporting of patient results by 1-2 days. A fluorescent monoclonal antibody pool (Light Diagnostics Pan-Enterovirus Blend; Millipore Inc., Temecula, Calif., USA) developed to identify various enterovirus isolates in culture was recently reported to also cross-react with rhinoviruses. We evaluated the use of this cross-reacting antibody, used in tandem with non-cross-reacting enterovirus antibodies (D(3) IFA; Diagnostic Hybrids Inc., Athens, Ohio, USA) to rapidly identify rhinoviruses in cell culture. METHODS: Microscope slides were prepared from cell cultures of 11 rhinovirus clinical isolates and a variety of other respiratory viruses. Slides were stained using both enterovirus antibody pools and examined for fluorescent activity. RESULTS: Positive fluorescence was observed in all the rhinovirus isolates tested using the pan-enterovirus antibody blend, but yielded negative results when stained using the D(3) antibodies. Both antibody products produced positive fluorescence for enterovirus isolates and produced negative results when a variety of other respiratory viruses were examined. CONCLUSION: Staining suspected rhinovirus isolates with each antibody pool affords a rapid means of identifying rhinoviruses and distinguishing them from enteroviruses, without the need for acid lability testing.

Key concepts: Rhinovirus, Enterovirus, Virology, Antibody, Monoclonal antibody, Microbiology, Biology, Staining

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Rapid Microscopic Method for the Confirmation of Rhinoviruses in Cell Culture — Research Paper | ScholarLens