2010•Unpublished venueRequires access

The risk of injury to the sural nerve during Achilles Tendon Repair using the Achillon Device: A cadaveric study

Johnny Arnouk, Ashish Patel, Joshua T. Mitgang, Yevgeniy Korshunov, Jaime A. Uribe

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The conventional open approach to Achilles Tendon Repair (ATR) has been associated with wound breakdown and infection. In an attempt to decrease the risk of iatrogenic wound complications the mini-open/percutaneous method for ATR has been developed. However, `blind' ATR using the percutaneous method risks damage to the sural nerve. Using intact cadaveric specimens, the current investigation attempted to quantify the risk of sural nerve injury using the Achillon Device. Findings demonstrate a 28% violation of the sural nerve by specimen and a 15% sural nerve violation rate per needle pass (n=54 total needle passes). Sural nerve violation was significantly increased during needle passage through outlet #1 vs. outlet #3 of the Achillon device. A substantial risk to sural nerve injury remains when utilizing the Achillon device for Achilles Tendon Repair.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The conventional open approach to Achilles Tendon Repair (ATR) has been associated with wound breakdown and infection. In an attempt to decrease the risk of iatrogenic wound complications the mini-open/percutaneous method for ATR has been developed. However, `blind' ATR using the percutaneous method risks damage to the sural nerve. Using intact cadaveric specimens, the current investigation attempted to quantify the risk of sural nerve injury using the Achillon Device. Findings demonstrate a 28% violation of the sural nerve by specimen and a 15% sural nerve violation rate per needle pass (n=54 total needle passes). Sural nerve violation was significantly increased during needle passage through outlet #1 vs. outlet #3 of the Achillon device. A substantial risk to sural nerve injury remains when utilizing the Achillon device for Achilles Tendon Repair.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The conventional open approach to Achilles Tendon Repair (ATR) has been associated with wound breakdown and infection. In an attempt to decrease the risk of iatrogenic wound complications the mini-open/percutaneous method for ATR has been developed. However, `blind' ATR using the percutaneous method risks damage to the sural nerve. Using intact cadaveric specimens, the current investigation attempted to quantify the risk of sural nerve injury using the Achillon Device. Findings demonstrate a 28% violation of the sural nerve by specimen and a 15% sural nerve violation rate per needle pass (n=54 total needle passes). Sural nerve violation was significantly increased during needle passage through outlet #1 vs. outlet #3 of the Achillon device. A substantial risk to sural nerve injury remains when utilizing the Achillon device for Achilles Tendon Repair.

Key concepts: Sural nerve, Cadaveric spasm, Medicine, Percutaneous, Achilles tendon, Surgery, Nerve repair, Tendon

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The risk of injury to the sural nerve during Achilles Tendon Repair using the Achillon Device: A cadaveric study — Research Paper | ScholarLens