1997•Journal of Computational ChemistryRequires access

A theoretical study on keto-enol tautomerization involving simple carbonyl derivatives

Doyoung Lee, Chang Kon Kim, Bon‐Su Lee, Ikchoon Lee, Byung Choon Lee

Open publisher page 55 citations

Abstract

The relative stabilities of the keto and enol forms [Δ E0 (enol-keto)] and the energy barriers to enolization of the keto forms [Δ E≠ (transition state-keto)] for CH3COR (R = CH3, H, F, and CN) and CH3CHY (Y = CH2, NH, and S) are investigated theoretically by Hartree-Fock and Möoller-Plesset second-order calculations with 6–31G** basis sets. Specific and bulk solvent effects are considered by incorporating one water molecule and applying the self-consistent reaction field (SCRF) method to the reaction system, respectively. The Δ E0MP2 values are all positive, in agreement with the lower stability of the enol form in the gas phase as well as in solution. In contrast to a relatively small effect of specific as well as bulk solvation on Δ E0, there is a large lowering of Δ E≠ (by ca. 30 kcal/mol) when solvent effects are accounted for. In general, both Δ E0 and Δ E≠ are depressed in solution and hence enolization is favored thermodynamically as well as kinetically. The keto form is strongly stabilized by a π donor, whereas the enol isomer is stabilized by a π as well as a σ-acceptor substituent, R. As a result, substituent R = F is the most unfavorable whereas R = CN is the most favorable for the enolization. The water catalyzed enolization in the neutral water proceeds concertedly, but carbon deprotonation is more important than carbonyl-oxygen protonation by water in the rate determining step. © 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The relative stabilities of the keto and enol forms [Δ E0 (enol-keto)] and the energy barriers to enolization of the keto forms [Δ E≠ (transition state-keto)] for CH3COR (R = CH3, H, F, and CN) and CH3CHY (Y = CH2, NH, and S) are investigated theoretically by Hartree-Fock and Möoller-Plesset second-order calculations with 6–31G** basis sets. Specific and bulk solvent effects are considered by incorporating one water molecule and applying the self-consistent reaction field (SCRF) method to the reaction system, respectively. The Δ E0MP2 values are all positive, in agreement with the lower stability of the enol form in the gas phase as well as in solution. In contrast to a relatively small effect of specific as well as bulk solvation on Δ E0, there is a large lowering of Δ E≠ (by ca. 30 kcal/mol) when solvent effects are accounted for. In general, both Δ E0 and Δ E≠ are depressed in solution and hence enolization is favored thermodynamically as well as kinetically. The keto form is strongly stabilized by a π donor, whereas the enol isomer is stabilized by a π as well as a σ-acceptor substituent, R. As a result, substituent R = F is the most unfavorable whereas R = CN is the most favorable for the enolization. The water catalyzed enolization in the neutral water proceeds concertedly, but carbon deprotonation is more important than carbonyl-oxygen protonation by water in the rate determining step. © 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 55 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The relative stabilities of the keto and enol forms [Δ E0 (enol-keto)] and the energy barriers to enolization of the keto forms [Δ E≠ (transition state-keto)] for CH3COR (R = CH3, H, F, and CN) and CH3CHY (Y = CH2, NH, and S) are investigated theoretically by Hartree-Fock and Möoller-Plesset second-order calculations with 6–31G** basis sets. Specific and bulk solvent effects are considered by incorporating one water molecule and applying the self-consistent reaction field (SCRF) method to the reaction system, respectively. The Δ E0MP2 values are all positive, in agreement with the lower stability of the enol form in the gas phase as well as in solution. In contrast to a relatively small effect of specific as well as bulk solvation on Δ E0, there is a large lowering of Δ E≠ (by ca. 30 kcal/mol) when solvent effects are accounted for. In general, both Δ E0 and Δ E≠ are depressed in solution and hence enolization is favored thermodynamically as well as kinetically. The keto form is strongly stabilized by a π donor, whereas the enol isomer is stabilized by a π as well as a σ-acceptor substituent, R. As a result, substituent R = F is the most unfavorable whereas R = CN is the most favorable for the enolization. The water catalyzed enolization in the neutral water proceeds concertedly, but carbon deprotonation is more important than carbonyl-oxygen protonation by water in the rate determining step. © 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Key concepts: Keto–enol tautomerism, Chemistry, Tautomer, Enol, Deprotonation, Protonation, Substituent, Solvation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A theoretical study on keto-enol tautomerization involving simple carbonyl derivatives — Research Paper | ScholarLens