1961New England Journal of MedicineRequires access

Experience with Portacaval Shunt for Portal Hypertension

George E. Wantz, Mary Ann Payne

Open publisher page 125 citations

Abstract

SINCE the beginning of our experience with the surgical treatment of portal hypertension, we have believed that the operation of choice is portacaval shunt and that splenorenal shunts, because they are small and so frequently inadequate, should be restricted to patients with portal veins unsuitable for anastomosis to the inferior vena cava.§ There is abundant evidence that such a procedure is followed by the disappearance of esophagogastric varices and therefore the elimination of the hazards of massive varical hemorrhage. Although this is a laudable surgical achievement, critical analysis suggests that the problem of portal hypertension is not as simple as . . .

About this research paper

What this paper is about

SINCE the beginning of our experience with the surgical treatment of portal hypertension, we have believed that the operation of choice is portacaval shunt and that splenorenal shunts, because they are small and so frequently inadequate, should be restricted to patients with portal veins unsuitable for anastomosis to the inferior vena cava.§ There is abundant evidence that such a procedure is followed by the disappearance of esophagogastric varices and therefore the elimination of the hazards of massive varical hemorrhage. Although this is a laudable surgical achievement, critical analysis suggests that the problem of portal hypertension is not as simple as . . .

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 125 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

SINCE the beginning of our experience with the surgical treatment of portal hypertension, we have believed that the operation of choice is portacaval shunt and that splenorenal shunts, because they are small and so frequently inadequate, should be restricted to patients with portal veins unsuitable for anastomosis to the inferior vena cava.§ There is abundant evidence that such a procedure is followed by the disappearance of esophagogastric varices and therefore the elimination of the hazards of massive varical hemorrhage. Although this is a laudable surgical achievement, critical analysis suggests that the problem of portal hypertension is not as simple as . . .

Key concepts: Medicine, Portal hypertension, Portacaval shunt, Portacaval anastomosis, Shunt (medical), Varices, Esophageal varices, Anastomosis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Experience with Portacaval Shunt for Portal Hypertension — Research Paper | ScholarLens