Remanent magnetization of the Permian Cutler Formation of western Colorado
Charles E. Helsley
Abstract
Open-access reader
Charles E. Helsley
Abstract
Open-access reader
The early paleomagnetic observations from the Permian period of the western United States were not subjected to demagnetization studies. Observations on the Lower Permian Cutler formation of western Colorado suggest that many of these older poles are in error by 10 or more degrees. The new pole from the Cutler formation is at 42.7°N, 121.9°E (α95=6.0) and is almost identical with the demagnetized results from eastern North America; it provides an excellent test of the dipolar hypothesis. The results of this study emphasize the need for additional study of the older paleomagnetic data for North America.
OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The early paleomagnetic observations from the Permian period of the western United States were not subjected to demagnetization studies. Observations on the Lower Permian Cutler formation of western Colorado suggest that many of these older poles are in error by 10 or more degrees. The new pole from the Cutler formation is at 42.7°N, 121.9°E (α95=6.0) and is almost identical with the demagnetized results from eastern North America; it provides an excellent test of the dipolar hypothesis. The results of this study emphasize the need for additional study of the older paleomagnetic data for North America.
Key concepts: Paleomagnetism, Permian, Geology, Paleontology, Remanence, Natural remanent magnetization, Demagnetizing field, Paleozoic